PLEASE NOTE:
*
CCNet 28/2001 - 19 February 2001
--------------------------------
"I suggest naming the National Spaceguard Center after the
noted
astronomer Ernst Oepik and locating it at Armagh Observatory
where he
worked and published the Irish Astronomical Journal. Many of his
pioneering publications dealt with comets and meteorites. Thanks
to him,
Britain's leading NEO experts are based there now. Since Oepik
also did
pioneering work on impacts, he published some of the first
scientific
studies about the potential hazards of cosmic impacts."
--S. Fred Singer, 19 February 2001
"Right now, Andrew Santo and his colleagues at The Johns
Hopkins
University's Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) are basking in the
glow of
success. Last Monday their creation, the NEAR Shoemaker
spacecraft, made
history's first landing on an asteroid, bringing a spectacular
finale
to a year of scientific discovery. But seven years ago, you
wouldn't have
wanted Santo's job. That's when NASA handed APL a Space Age
mission
impossible: Design, build and test the first spacecraft to orbit
an
asteroid, do it for a fraction of what most deep-space missions
cost,
and do it in just 24 months. The mission, called NEAR, was to
open a new
chapter in deep-space exploration by becoming the first in NASA's
so-
called Discovery missions, whose mandate included development
times of less
than 3 years."
--Andrew Chaikin, Space.com, 15 February 2001
(1) NEAR DATA EXPECTED FROM EROS SURFACE
Space.com, 16 February 2001
(2) NEAR SHOEMAKER: THE LITTLE SPACECRAFT THAT COULD
Space.com, 15 February 2001
(3) THE SUN DOES A FLIP: SOLAR MAXIMUM IS HERE
NASA SCIENCE News, 15 February 2001
(4) CLUSTER'S NEW VIEW OF NEAR-EARTH SPACE
Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>
(5) TRAVELING TO THE DAWN OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
Ron Baalke <baalke@jpl.nasa.gov>
(6) COPING WITH NATURAL DISASTERS
Stanford News Service <stanford.report@forsythe.stanford.edu>
(7) WORKSHOP ON EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE ON DISASTER MANAGEMENT
ESA <esaweb@esa.int>
(8) WHY BRITAIN'S NEO CENTRE SHOULD BE NAMED IN HONOUR OF ERNST
OEPIK
S. Fred Singer <singer@sepp.org>
(9) ASTEROID OWNERS LIABLE FOR IMPACT DAMAGE?
Graham Richard Pointer <grp1@st-andrews.ac.uk>
(10) DIETZ AND GLIKSON ON IMPACT VOLCANISM AND P/Tr
Hermann Burchard <burchar@mail.math.okstate.edu>
(11) THE BREAK-UP OF PANGEA
Timo Niroma <timo.niroma@tilmari.pp.fi]
(12) AND FINALLY: RUSSIAN COMMUNISTS BLAME U.S. FOR PUTIN'S MIR
DECISION
Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>
=============
(1) NEAR DATA EXPECTED FROM EROS SURFACE
From Space.com, 16 February 2001
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/near_radio_010216.html
By Leonard David
Senior Space Writer
WASHINGTON -- This is broadcast station NEAR on your space dial.
Stay tuned!
Sitting atop far flung Asteroid 433 Eros, NASA's Near Earth
Asteroid
Rendezvous (NEAR) Shoemaker spacecraft is gathering science data
for
transmission to Earth over the weekend.
Following a successful soft landing on the giant chunk of space
flotsam, the
probe's first on-the-spot measurements using a Gamma Ray
Spectrometer should
be received by ground stations on February 18.
That Gamma Ray instrument -- either resting above or in the
asteroid's rock
and dirt covering -- is focused on a 4-inch (10-centimeter)
circle of Eros.
An abundance of several important elements, such as potassium,
silicon and
iron can be measured. Using gamma rays, the device detects
specific elements
in the asteroid's surface.
Mission controllers at The Johns Hopkins University Applied
Physics
Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Maryland report that commands have
been sent to
NEAR Shoemaker to start science operations on the asteroid's
surface. APL
both designed and is managing the asteroid surveying craft for
NASA.
Data is being collected by both the Gamma Ray Spectrometer, as
well as an
onboard magnetometer.
To date, no magnetic field has been found at Eros. Discovery of
an intrinsic
magnetic field at Eros would be the first definitive detection of
magnetism
at an asteroid. The find would have important implications about
the space
rock's thermal and geologic history.
Contact!
"We're pretty sure the spacecraft has received commands.
There's been a
voltage drain, indicating the Gamma Ray instrument is doing what
it needs to
do," said Helen Worth, an APL spokeswoman.
The relaying of science data from the asteroid to Earth is
expected around
11:23 a.m. EST (16:23 GMT) Sunday. However, it is likely to take
until early
Monday to ascertain whether data received is useful, Worth told
SPACE.com.
NASA gave the go-ahead for engineers and scientists to remain in
radio lock
with NEAR Shoemaker after the craft gently touched down on Eros
February 12.
The mission was to conclude two days later. A surprise to many,
the probe
remained intact and in good working order after coming to a stop
on the
asteroid's rocky surface.
NASA extended the mission for up to 10 days. There is the
possibility of a
further extension, to assure that enough listening time from
ground stations
is found.
Following four-year a journey of more than 2 billion miles (3.2
billion
kilometers), and a yearlong observational campaign around Eros,
NEAR
Shoemaker braked itself onto the asteroid, plopping down at less
than 4
miles per hour (between 1.5 and 1.8 meters per second).
If the science data direct from the asteroid is received on
Earth, it will
be almost five years to the day after being launched.
"We're in contact and delighted," said Robert Farquhar,
NEAR mission
director at APL. "We expect to have all the data that we
need by the end of
February," he told SPACE.com.
High science on low-gain
The car-sized spacecraft had already gleaned 10 times more data
during its
circling of Eros than originally planned. It completed all the
mission's
science goals before Monday's landing on the boulder-strewn
mini-world.
Science data is being slowly transmitted through the spacecraft's
low-gain
antenna, at just 10 bytes per second.
"We don't know if the instrument's still working," said
Jacob Trombka, NEAR
team leader for the X-ray Gamma Ray Spectrometer at NASA's
Goddard Space
Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. "The detectors are
very hardy. The
thing I'm more worried about is the wiring and all the electronic
connections," he said.
"We won't know if it's working until Sunday. We're looking
forward to seeing
our first data right from the surface," Trombka told
SPACE.com.
Trombka said the Gamma Ray device will take a period of time to
stabilize
and provide the best and most reliable science information. The
detector
itself is anywhere from in the dusty covering of Eros to sitting
about a 3.3
feet (1 meter) above the surface. "It doesn't make much
difference," he
said.
"Within seven days to 10 days we should have a good data
set," Trombka said.
"If we get data, this is going to be an extremely good test
of this sensor
for future missions, particularly for rovers on Mars," he
said.
Copyright 2001, Space.com
==========
(2) NEAR SHOEMAKER: THE LITTLE SPACECRAFT THAT COULD
From Space.com, 15 February 2001
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/near_could_010215.html
By Andrew Chaikin
Editor, Space Illustrated Magazine
Right now, Andrew Santo and his colleagues at The Johns Hopkins
University's
Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) are basking in the glow of
success. Last
Monday their creation, the NEAR Shoemaker spacecraft, made
history's first
landing on an asteroid, bringing a spectacular finale to a year
of
scientific discovery. But seven years ago, you wouldn't have
wanted Santo's
job.
That's when NASA handed APL a Space Age mission impossible:
Design, build
and test the first spacecraft to orbit an asteroid, do it for a
fraction of
what most deep-space missions cost, and do it in just 24 months.
The
mission, called NEAR, was to open a new chapter in deep-space
exploration by
becoming the first in NASA's so-called Discovery missions, whose
mandate
included development times of less than 3 years.
Santo, who served as spacecraft systems engineer on the NEAR
project, says
the assignment wasn't greeted with unanimous optimism at APL.
"At the time
we started," he recalled, "I bet about half the team
was doubtful we could
make it."
But Santo knew they had no choice. The only possible launch dates
to the
target the Asteroid 433 Eros were a mere 12 days in February 1996
(and to
add to the pressure, the launch window on each of those days was
only one
minute long). After that, Eros would no longer be positioned for
a
spacecraft to go there easily from Earth.
Instead of being an impossible burden, however, Santo said the
unforgiving
schedule was actually an advantage. "That really helped
us," he said. "That
very narrow launch window helped us focus the team."
The overriding importance of the schedule pushed Santo and his
teammates to
adopt an approach that was highly unorthodox in the high-tech
world of
aerospace. Instead of requiring specially built components, the
NEAR team
chose hardware already available and ready to use without
modifications.
"I'd say 70 percent of the spacecraft components were
off-the-shelf," Santo
said. That kept costs down, helping the project stay within its
budget of
$113 million. Just as important, it saved time.
That doesn't mean everything went smoothly. A star tracking
device procured
by the team turned out to have a faulty cooling system,
decreasing its
accuracy. And engineers studying the craft's solar panels
realized that if
the spacecraft was rotated into and out of the harsh sunlight of
space, the
panels would expand and contract so much they could start to come
apart. And
there were other snags, but the NEAR team couldn't always afford
to have
them fixed. "Other people might have been forced to tell the
vendor, 'Take
this box apart and fix your problem,'" Santo said. "Our
concern was, if we
told the vendor to fix it, we would have missed our
schedule."
In the end, Santo and his teammates managed to find ways to work
around the
problems. For the solar panels, for example, the solution was to
avoid
drastic changes in temperature by keeping the panels pointed at
the Sun
throughout the trip to Eros. That could have been a problem for
communications, since the craft would have to be aimed directly
at Earth for
the high-gain antenna to work. But tests showed that the
spacecraft's
communications system would perform better than expected, and the
engineers
realized they could use the craft's low-gain antenna during the
outward-bound cruise.
And it wasn't long before the mood among the NEAR team changed
from
skepticism to optimism. "People had the feeling, 'Hey, we
can really do
this,'" Santo recalled. "And once that feeling started
to go through the
team, we had unbelievable team morale. People would work all
hours of the
night and day -- not because they wanted to impress their boss,
but because
they didn't want to let down the other guys on the team."
NEAR was finished in time for its planned launch on February 17,
1996, and
the nearly three-year-long trip to Eros began. Along the way, the
team
refined the spacecraft's onboard computer programs, working by
remote
control to fix software bugs. "What surprised me was the
lack of problems
that we had," Santo said. Except for a power problem that
disabled one of
the craft's scientific instruments, an infrared spectrometer,
"the
spacecraft had no problems."
That is, until it reached its destination in December 1998.
Instead of going
into orbit around the asteroid, NEAR mysteriously aborted its
planned
maneuver and began firing thrusters wildly, spewing precious fuel
into
space. "Even today we don't know what happened," Santo
said.
For days, trackers on Earth had no contact with the spacecraft,
prompting
chilling memories of another failed mission, Mars Observer, which
was lost
just before it was to orbit Mars in 1993.
"That was the first thing that went through our minds,"
said APL's Thomas
Coughlin, NEAR project manager. And at the Deep Space Network
(DSN), the
collection of tracking stations used to maintain contact with
NASA's solar
system missions, there were dire predictions. "The guys at
the DSN were
saying, 'You're going to find this thing in a million
pieces.'"
But the dire predictions didn't come true. The craft's onboard
safety system
kicked in and reestablished radio contact with home. "It
found us, we didn't
find it," said Coughlin. By early January 1999, NEAR was on
course for a
second rendezvous with Eros on Valentine's Day, 2000.
But what about the spent fuel? Would there be enough left to
continue the
mission? The answer to that had been decided before NEAR left
Earth.
Luckily, the NEAR team brought their creation in 11 pounds (5
kilograms)
under its assigned weight limit, allowing the craft to carry 5
extra
kilograms of fuel. That extra amount proved to be enough for the
entire year
of operations at Eros. Said Santo, "That extra 5 kilograms
of fuel that we
loaded probably saved the mission. It shows you that this is a
tight
business. You can do 99 things right, but if you do the 100th
thing wrong,
it can kill you."
Renamed in memory of the late planetary scientist, Gene
Shoemaker, NEAR
Shoemaker orbited Eros for a full year, giving scientists a
bounty of data
that included more than 100,000 close-up images. And then, last
Monday, came
the bonus. "I think the team thought, we've been there long
enough, let's
try something new," Santo said. "Let's have some fun.
Let's see if we can
land this thing." Many on the project were skeptical that
NEAR would survive
its landing attempt. But as Coughlin said, "We'd thought it
thorough, and
knew everything had to go right. And it did go right."
NEAR Shoemaker's achievement has given NASA a badly needed
success, in the
wake of two failed Mars missions in 1999. "I think it truly
has raised the
bar a little bit on the new paradigm of how to do these 'Faster,
Better,
Cheaper' missions," Coughlin said. "It's a perfect
example of something that
did work."
At the Applied Physics Lab, meanwhile, the experience gained from
the NEAR
mission will be used for other deep-space missions, including the
planned
Comet Nucleus Tour and a Mercury orbiter called MESSENGER. Said
Santo,
"We're looking forward to the next level of
challenges."
Copyright 2001, Space.com
===========
(3) THE SUN DOES A FLIP: SOLAR MAXIMUM IS HERE
From NASA SCIENCE News, 15 February 2001
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast15feb_1.htm?list154233
NASA scientists who monitor the Sun say that our star's awesome
magnetic
field is flipping -- a sure sign that solar maximum is here.
February 15, 2001 -- You can't tell by looking, but scientists
say the Sun
has just undergone an important change. Our star's magnetic field
has
flipped.
The Sun's magnetic north pole, which was in the northern
hemisphere just a
few months ago, now points south. It's a topsy-turvy situation,
but not an
unexpected one.
"This always happens around the time of solar maximum,"
says David Hathaway,
a solar physicist at the Marshall Space Flight Center. "The
magnetic poles
exchange places at the peak of the sunspot cycle. In fact, it's a
good
indication that Solar Max is really here."
The Sun's magnetic poles will remain as they are now, with the
north
magnetic pole pointing through the Sun's southern hemisphere,
until the year
2012 when they will reverse again. This transition happens, as
far as we
know, at the peak of every 11-year sunspot cycle -- like
clockwork.
Earth's magnetic field also flips, but with less regularity.
Consecutive
reversals are spaced 5 thousand years to 50 million years apart.
The last
reversal happened 740,000 years ago. Some researchers think our
planet is
overdue for another one, but nobody knows exactly when the next
reversal
might occur.
Although solar and terrestrial magnetic fields behave
differently, they do
have something in common: their shape. During solar minimum the
Sun's field,
like Earth's, resembles that of an iron bar magnet, with great
closed loops
near the equator and open field lines near the poles. Scientists
call such a
field a "dipole." The Sun's dipolar field is about as
strong as a
refrigerator magnet, or 50 gauss (a unit of magnetic intensity).
Earth's
magnetic field is 100 times weaker.
When solar maximum arrives and sunspots pepper the face of the
Sun, our
star's magnetic field begins to change. Sunspots are places where
intense
magnetic loops -- hundreds of times stronger than the ambient
dipole field
-- poke through the photosphere.
"Meridional flows on the Sun's surface carry magnetic fields
from
mid-latitude sunspots to the Sun's poles," explains
Hathaway. "The poles end
up flipping because these flows transport south-pointing magnetic
flux to
the north magnetic pole, and north-pointing flux to the south
magnetic
pole." The dipole field steadily weakens as
oppositely-directed flux
accumulates at the Sun's poles until, at the height of solar
maximum, the
magnetic poles change polarity and begin to grow in a new
direction.
Hathaway noticed the latest polar reversal in a "magnetic
butterfly
diagram." Using data collected by astronomers at the U.S.
National Solar
Observatory on Kitt Peak, he plotted the Sun's average magnetic
field, day
by day, as a function of solar latitude and time from 1975
through the
present. The result is a sort of strip chart recording that
reveals evolving
magnetic patterns on the Sun's surface. "We call it a
butterfly diagram," he
says, "because sunspots make a pattern in this plot that
looks like the
wings of a butterfly."
In the butterfly diagram, pictured below, the Sun's polar fields
appear as
strips of uniform color near 90 degrees latitude. When the colors
change (in
this case from blue to yellow or vice versa) it means the polar
fields have
switched signs.
The ongoing changes are not confined to the space immediately
around our
star, Hathaway added. The Sun's magnetic field envelops the
entire solar
system in a bubble that scientists call the
"heliosphere." The heliosphere
extends 50 to 100 astronomical units (AU) beyond the orbit of
Pluto. Inside
it is the solar system -- outside is interstellar space.
"Changes in the Sun's magnetic field are carried outward
through the
heliosphere by the solar wind," explains Steve Suess,
another solar
physicist at the Marshall Space Flight Center. "It takes
about a year for
disturbances to propagate all the way from the Sun to the outer
bounds of
the heliosphere."
Because the Sun rotates (once every 27 days) solar magnetic
fields corkscrew
outwards in the shape of an Archimedian spiral. Far above the
poles the
magnetic fields twist around like a child's Slinky toy.
Because of all the twists and turns, "the impact of the
field reversal on
the heliosphere is complicated," says Hathaway. Sunspots are
sources of
intense magnetic knots that spiral outwards even as the dipole
field
vanishes. The heliosphere doesn't simply wink out of existence
when the
poles flip -- there are plenty of complex magnetic structures to
fill the
void.
Or so the theory goes.... Researchers have never seen the
magnetic flip
happen from the best possible point of view -- that is, from the
top down.
But now, the unique Ulysses spacecraft may give scientists a
reality check.
Ulysses, an international joint venture of the European Space
Agency and
NASA, was launched in 1990 to observe the solar system from very
high solar
latitudes. Every six years the spacecraft flies 2.2 AU over the
Sun's poles.
No other probe travels so far above the orbital plane of the
planets.
"Ulysses just passed under the Sun's south pole," says
Suess, a mission
co-Investigator. "Now it will loop back and fly over the
north pole in the
fall."
"This is the most important part of our mission," he
says. Ulysses last flew
over the Sun's poles in 1994 and 1996, during solar minimum, and
the craft
made several important discoveries about cosmic rays, the solar
wind, and
more. "Now we get to see the Sun's poles during the other
extreme: Solar
Max. Our data will cover a complete solar cycle."
To learn more about the Sun's changing magnetic field and how it
is
generated, please visit "The Solar Dynamo," a web page
prepared by the
NASA/Marshall solar research group. Updates from the Ulysses
spacecraft may
be found on the Internet from JPL at http://ulysses.jpl.nasa.gov.
========
(4) CLUSTER'S NEW VIEW OF NEAR-EARTH SPACE
From Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>
European Space Agency
Press Information Note Nr. 01-2001
Paris, France 16 February 2001
Cluster's New View of near-Earth Space
Studies of near-Earth space will never be the same again,
following the
successful commissioning of the European Space Agency's Cluster
mission.
For the first time in the history of space exploration, four
identical
spacecraft have been despatched to explore the invisible magnetic
"bubble"
that surrounds our planet -- the magnetosphere. Dozens of
instruments on
board the Cluster quartet have now begun to 'map' this region in
unprecedented detail.
Over the next two years, Cluster will provide a unique,
three-dimensional
view of the battleground between the Earth and our nearest star.
Hundreds of
scientists around the world are eagerly waiting to analyse this
treasure
trove of data.
The Solar-Terrestrial Battleground
Our Earth is an oasis in space -- the only haven of life yet
discovered in
the entire Universe. Yet, just a few hundred kilometres above our
heads, a
continuous battle is being fought between the forces of nature.
Like a ship in an everlasting storm, the Earth is bombarded by
swarms of
particles that are ejected from the Sun, then sweep towards us
through space
at supersonic speeds. Most of these cosmic "bullets" in
the solar wind are
deflected by the planet's magnetic shield, the magnetosphere, and
sail
harmlessly by.
But Earth's shield is not invulnerable. Gusts in the solar wind
can squeeze
it mercilessly, pushing it back towards the planet. Weak spots in
the
defences allow energetic particles to penetrate. As they cascade
down the
magnetic field lines, they collide with molecules in the upper
atmosphere.
One spectacular result is the aurora, beautiful curtains of light
that grace
the polar skies.
Not all side-effects of solar storms are as harmless.
Particularly severe
magnetic storms on our nearest star can cause havoc back on
Earth, with
widespread power cuts, disrupted radio communications and damage
to
satellites.
Scientists have been studying this continuous feud between the
Sun and Earth
for many years, first from the ground and then with the aid of
single
satellites. But the complexities of the Sun-Earth connection have
always --
until now -- eluded them.
Cluster's 3-D View
Cluster is now offering the first opportunity to improve the
current state
of knowledge about the magnetosphere. In the last few months,
scientists
have begun to sample the first intriguing morsels from the feast
of
fascinating information that will accumulate over the
two-year-long duration
of the mission.
Preliminary analysis of this early data is already providing new
insights
into the interaction between the electrically charged particles
of the solar
wind and our planet's magnetic field.
The key to this scientific revolution is Cluster's ability to fly
in close
formation along elongated orbits which take them between 19,000
and 119,000
km from the planet -- almost one third of the way to the Moon.
During their
passage around the Earth, the spacecraft are sometimes inside the
Earth's
magnetic shield and sometimes outside, fully exposed to the
supersonic solar
wind.
As the mini-flotilla flies in a tetrahedral (lopsided pyramid)
pattern
around the planet, its suite of scientific sensors studies the
changes
taking place around each spacecraft. By comparing the times of
these events,
scientists are able to obtain the first three-dimensional picture
of
near-Earth space.
First Results
Cluster's first glimpses of the continuously fluctuating magnetic
battleground came on 9 November 2000, when the quartet made their
first
crossings of the magnetopause -- the boundary between
interplanetary space
(where the solar wind reigns supreme) and the Earth's region of
magnetic
domination.
These crossings were a surprise for the Cluster science team,
since they
occurred about one week earlier than predicted.
Data from the experiments on Cluster clearly showed that gusts in
the solar
wind were causing the magnetosphere to balloon in and out. These
rapid
fluctuations in size meant that the Cluster spacecraft were
alternately
inside and outside Earth's magnetic field. For the first time,
scientists
were able to receive data simultaneously from both sides of the
magnetopause
--something that is only possible with a multi-spacecraft
mission.
At the peak of the sunstorm, the spacecraft were exposed to the
solar wind
for more than 2 hours until the compression of the magnetosphere
decreased
and the spacecraft moved back inside the Earth's domain.
Since then, the Cluster spacecraft have made regular measurements
of the
magnetopause. One of the earliest interesting discoveries has
been the
confirmation of the existence of waves along this ever-shifting
boundary in
space.
"They are like waves that form on the surface of a lake when
the wind is
blowing," said Cluster Project Scientist, Philippe Escoubet.
"The Cluster
spacecraft give us for the first time the size and speed of these
waves."
"Cluster has given us the first observational proof that
these waves exist,"
said Dr. Nicole Cornilleau-Wehrlin of CETP in Vélizy, Principal
Investigator
on the STAFF experiment. "Further studies will enable us to
discover more
about what happens and why."
By late December, the elliptical Cluster orbits carried the
quartet close to
a huge shock wave in near-Earth space. This bow shock, which lies
some
100,000 km from the planet, forms when particles in the solar
wind slow to
subsonic speeds after slamming into Earth's magnetic shield at
more than 1
million km/h. Cluster's battery of instruments is beginning to
record in
great detail what happens at this turbulent barrier.
Once again, gusts in the stream of solar particles caused the
magnetosphere
to behave like a punchbag undergoing heavy body blows. These
"punches"
caused the bow shock to migrate through space, crossing and
recrossing the
Cluster spacecraft at irregular intervals.
"This is the first time we have ever seen the bow shock in
such remarkable
detail," said Professor André Balogh of Imperial College
London, the
Principal Investigator for the FGM experiment on Cluster.
Comparisons of spacecraft measurements will also be invaluable
for in-depth
studies of other parts of the magnetosphere. Of particular
interest to
scientists are the cusps -- funnel-shaped gaps in the Earth's
magnetic
shield that that guide electrified particles into the upper
atmosphere.
The first Cluster observations of the north polar cusp were made
on 14
January 2001, when shifts in the solar wind caused the spacecraft
to pass
right through this narrow "window" in the magnetic
envelope at an altitude
of about 64,000 km. The EISCAT ground-based radar in Svalbard,
which lay
beneath the Cluster spacecraft at that time, confirmed the abrupt
change in
the cusp's position.
Preliminary analysis of data from Cluster indicates that the
upper regions
of the cusp were moving through space at around 30 km/s. Further
studies of
the different data sets are expected to provide valuable new
insights into
the physical processes taking place in these key regions above
the Earth's
magnetic poles.
"This is a very dynamic region, but it has only been studied
previously by
single spacecraft," said Dr. Escoubet. "This is why the
Cluster measurements
are so important. With four spacecraft we can obtain the most
accurate,
three-dimensional view of what is happening around our
planet."
Cluster and the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) make up
the
Solar-Terrestrial Science Programme -- one of the Cornerstones of
ESA's
Horizons 2000 long term science plan. Together, they are playing
key roles
in international efforts to investigate the physical interaction
between the
Sun and Earth.
For more information, please contact:
ESA - Communication Department
Media Relations Office
Tel: +33 (0)1.53.69.71.55
Fax: +33 (0)1.53.69.76.90
Dr. Philippe Escoubet
ESA Cluster Project Scientist
ESA - Estec (Noordwijk, Nl)
Tel: +31 71 565 3454
Email: cpescoub@estec.esa.nl
Prof. André Balogh
Principal Investigator for Cluster's FGM experiment
Imperial College (London, UK)
Tel: 44-(0)20-75947768
Email: a.balogh@ic.ac.uk
Dr. Nicole Cornilleau-Wehrlin
Principal Investigator for Cluster's STAFF experiment
CETP (Velizy, France)
Tel: 33139254898
Email: nicole.cornilleau@cetp.ipsl.fr
Further information on Cluster and the ESA Science Programme can
be found on
the
World Wide Web at: http://sci.esa.int/cluster
USEFUL LINKS FOR THIS STORY
* Cluster II home page
http://sci.esa.int/cluster/
* The instruments onboard Cluster
http://sci.esa.int/content/doc/c6/1990_.htm
* EISCAT web site
http://www.eiscat.uit.no/eiscat.html
* SOHO mission
http://sohowww.estec.esa.nl/
IMAGE CAPTIONS:
[Figure 1: http://spdext.estec.esa.nl/content/doc/f7/26103_-1.jpg,
390 KB]
Main regions of the magnetosphere to be studied by Cluster.
[Figure 2: http://spdext.estec.esa.nl/content/doc/f7/26103_-2.jpg,
367 KB]
Artists' impression of a wave on the magnetopause passing by the
four
Cluster
satellites. See also the MPEG movie,
http://sci2.esa.int/cluster/videos/cluster3.mpg
[1.66 MB].
[Figure 3: http://spdext.estec.esa.nl/content/doc/f7/26103_-3.jpg,
246 KB]
Data plots from the FGM instrument. Sharp decreases of the
magnetic field on
SC2 (red line) indicate crossing of the bow shock. The bow shock
was first
hovering very close to spacecraft 2 (06:50 to 07:03), then moved
sunward of
all four spacecraft (07:03 to 07:12). Later it stayed between
spacecraft 2
and
the other three spacecraft. Data courtesy of FGM Principal
Investigator,
Prof.
Andre Balogh (Imperial College, London, UK).
[Figure 4: http://spdext.estec.esa.nl/content/doc/f7/26103_-4.jpg,
310 KB]
Artists' impression of the Cluster spacecraft crossing the polar
cusp.
Particles from the solar wind precipitate through the polar cusp
and reach
the Earth's atmosphere.
[Figure 5: http://spdext.estec.esa.nl/content/doc/f7/26103_-5.jpg,
340 KB]
Data plots from the CIS instrument. These data plots from the CIS
experiment
on three Cluster spacecraft show the measured population of ions
(charged
particles) with energy from about 30 eV up to about 30 KeV
between 07 and
17 GMT on 14 January 2001. The polar cusp was encountered between
13:30 and
13:50. Detailed comparison of the data on the different
spacecraft indicates
that the polar cusp was moving toward the Cluster spacecraft at a
speed
between 10 and 30 km/s. The motion of the cusp in relation to
Cluster is
shown on the left. Data courtesy of CIS Principal Investigator,
Prof. Henri
Reme and CIS Co-Investigator Jean-Michel Bosqued (CESR, Toulouse,
France).
==========
(5) TRAVELING TO THE DAWN OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
From Ron Baalke <baalke@jpl.nasa.gov>
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/dawn_mission_010216.html
Traveling to the Dawn of the Solar System
By John G. Watson
space.com
16 February 2001
Pasadena, Calif.-- The Dawn mission is a "compare and
contrast" assignment
of mammoth proportions: visit two vastly varying asteroids left
over from
the beginning of our solar system and find out what they're made
of.
Last month, NASA chose the Dawn mission, which will take nine
years to visit
two primordial asteroids, for detailed study as a candidate for
the agency's
Discovery Missions Program.
Targeting the Asteroid Belt between Mars and Jupiter, Dawn will
first orbit
Vesta, a dry rock thought to be the source of many meteorites
that have
impacted Earth, and then Ceres, considered a water-rich asteroid
that likely
does not have a metallic core, unlike Vesta.
Full story here:
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/dawn_mission_010216.html
==========
(6) COPING WITH NATURAL DISASTERS
From Stanford News Service <stanford.report@forsythe.stanford.edu>
2/8/01
CONTACT: Mark Shwartz, News Service (650) 723-9296;
mshwartz@stanford.edu
COMMENT: W. Gary Ernst, Department of Geological &
Environmental Sciences
(650) 723-0815; ernst@pangea.stanford.edu
Anne S. Kiremidjian, Department of Civil &
Environmental
Engineering
(650) 723-4164; kiremidjian@ce.stanford.edu
EDITORS: Professors W. Gary Ernst and Anne S. Kiremidjian will
participate
in the symposium, ``Pacific Rim natural disasters - social,
economic and
political impacts,`` at the annual meeting of the American
Association for
the Advancement of Science on Sat., Feb. 17, from 3 p.m. to 6
p.m. PT, at
the Hilton San Francisco & Towers, 333 O`Farrell St., San
Francisco, CA
94102. For more information, see the AAAS website at
http://www.aaas.org/meetings
EMBARGOED until Sat., Feb. 17, at 3 p.m. PT
Relevant Web URLs:
http://www.crowding-rim.org
http://www.usgs.gov
http://blume.stanford.edu
Coping with natural disasters along the Pacific Rim
The Pacific Rim is home to nearly two billion people from widely
diverse
cultures and backgrounds, yet all share a common predicament:
Sooner or
later, a natural disaster will touch their lives.
"Tsunamis, earthquakes, mudflows, tropical storms - nowhere
is the Pacific
Rim free of these natural hazards," says geologist W. Gary
Ernst, the
Benjamin M. Page Professor of Earth Sciences at Stanford.
Ernst will moderate a symposium on the social, economic and
political
impacts of geological and climatic catastrophes in the Pacific
Rim - a vast
region that includes the Pacific coasts of Australia, Asia and
the Americas
- during the annual meeting of the American Association for the
Advancement
of Science (AAAS) in San Francisco Feb. 17.
Quakes, volcanoes and tsunamis
Ernst points out that Pacific Rim nations are routinely subjected
to
earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis - the inevitable
consequence of
powerful tectonic forces constantly shaping the region.
For example, major earthquakes regularly occur along California`s
San
Andreas fault - a giant fracture in the Earth that marks the
boundary
between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates.
Continuous grinding
between those two massive plates produces underground stresses
that
eventually trigger destructive quakes up and down the fault
system.
While the San Andreas is California`s best known fault, Ernst
points out
that the entire state is at risk - along with the rest of the
Pacific Rim.
``Ground shaking and loss of life and property have been constant
dangers in
the past,`` he notes, ``as evidenced by the devastation at
Anchorage, Alaska
(1964); Mexico City (1985); Kobe, Japan (1995) and Chi-Chi,
Taiwan (1999).
Because of the inexorable, continuing differential movements of
tectonic
plates around the Pacific Basin, earthquakes assuredly will
accompany us in
the future.``
Volcanoes are another hazard in many parts of the region. The
1883 eruption
of Krakatoa between Java and Sumatra produced a devastating
tsunami that
killed some 36,000 people. A century later, a much smaller
volcanic eruption
in Colombia triggered a catastrophic mudflow that left some
23,000 dead.
Since 1980, volcanic activity has forced tens of thousands to
flee their
homes in Alaska, Washington State, Mexico and the Philippines.
``As populations in the Pacific Rim continue to grow, such
disasters are apt
to cause even greater hardship,`` Ernst warns.
Climate catastrophes
In addition to geologic hazards, the Pacific Rim is routinely
subjected to
meteorological catastrophes in the form of typhoons, floods and
droughts.
These extreme climatic events are made worse every few years by
the
occurrence of unusually warm ocean conditions - the phenomenon
known as El
Ni-o.
``The Pacific Ocean - the world`s largest body of water -
is the spawning
ground for the planet`s most powerful cyclonic systems,`` says
Ernst.
He points out that the Pacific receives an enormous input of
solar energy,
especially in the tropics, producing powerful storms that ``rival
and often
exceed geologic disasters in terms of loss of life and
property.``
Tropical storms in the Pacific also have a tremendous impact on
the rest of
the planet, particularly in the heavily populated Indian Ocean
region. Ernst
points out that, since 1970, some 738,000 residents of Bangladesh
have died
in coastal flooding caused by powerful tropical cyclones.
Managing disaster
Several speakers invited to the AAAS symposium will address ways
that
Pacific Rim nations can manage the human and financial cost of
catastrophe.
Anne S. Kiremidjian, a professor of civil and environmental
engineering at
Stanford, will discuss the importance of making accurate
assessments of
economic loss following a catastrophic earthquake.
Kiremidjian will focus on several recent quakes, including
the large
temblor that devastated Chi-chi, Taiwan, on Sept. 21, 1999.
Nearly 2,500
people died in that event, and damages were estimated at between
$20 and $30
billion. How well these estimates reflect actual loss is a
question often
raised by public officials, insurance executives and other
business leaders,
she notes.
Kiremidjian and her colleagues have developed analytical models
that permit
more accurate forecasts of potential earthquake damage based on
specific
conditions, such as the severity of ground motion and the
structural
integrity of buildings in the area.
``In order to maximize the chance of survival in earthquake
country,`` says
Ernst, ``individuals and organizations need to plan for the
inevitable `big
one.` The question is not whether such shaking will occur, but
when.``
Alcira Kreimer of the World Bank`s Disaster Management Facility
will focus
on the indirect socioeconomic impact of disasters, particularly
in
developing nations.
``Between 1990 and 1998, more than 97 percent of all natural
disaster-related deaths were in developing countries,`` she says,
adding
that the average economic loss during a disaster as a proportion
of gross
domestic production is 20 percent higher in developing countries
than in
industrialized nations.
Stephen Guptill of the U.S. Geological Survey will discuss
efforts to
control outbreaks of diseases that often occur in the aftermath
of a
disaster - including cholera and typhoid, which are caused by
contaminated
water supplies.
Other speakers will discuss the role of homeowners and insurance
companies
in managing earthquake risk, as well as community efforts to
assess the risk
of hazards before they occur.
``This is the century of the Pacific Rim - a region of
spectacular
sociopolitical, economic and cultural growth,`` observes Ernst,
noting that
when disaster strikes Taiwan or Silicon Valley, the economic
repercussions
are felt half a world away.
``Natural disaster reduction must be coordinated across and
transcend
political boundaries if we are to be more effective in the
future,`` he
concludes. ``Such transnational sociopolitical policies will only
be
implemented, however, as populations at risk and their
governments come to
understand the true cost of inaction.``
By Mark Shwartz
=========
(7) WORKSHOP ON EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE ON DISASTER MANAGEMENT
From ESA <esaweb@esa.int>
The European Space Agency and the European Commission's
Information Society
Directorate-General are jointly organising a workshop on "A
European
Perspective on Disaster Management" at ESA's ESRIN
establishment in
Frascati, Italy, from 27 February to 1 March.
The workshop will present ongoing ESA and European Union projects
related to
management of disasters, caused by flood and fire in particular.
It will
introduce ESA's Data User Programme (DUP) and EU-funded projects,
discussing
the user's viewpoint in the context of the Cliff (CLuster
Initiative for
Flood and Fire Emergencies) and Formidable (Friendly Operational
Risk
Management through Interoperable Decision Aid Based on Local
Environment)
initiatives.
The aim is to stimulate direct interaction and exchange of
information
between operational and scientific user communities and
development and
service industries on topics such as methodologies, systems, user
needs,
information handling and services, focusing mainly on flood and
fire cases.
About 100 participants from European civil protection entities,
user
communities, space agencies and service industries will be
attending.
A poster session and a presentation of the International Charter
on Space
and Major Disasters are included in the programme.
In parallel with the workshop, a meeting of the GMES (Global
Monitoring for
Environment and Security) working group on disaster management is
being
organised at ESRIN.
The workshop starts at 09h00 on 27 February. It is open to the
press. If
interested, please inform Franca Morgia by fax at +39 06
94180952.
For more information, please contact:
Luigi Fusco
ESA-ESRIN
Earth Observation Applications Department
Tel. +39 06 94180530, Fax +39 06 94180552
Email: Luigi.Fusco@esa.int
Franca Morgia
ESA-ESRIN
Communications Office
Tel. +39 06 94180951, Fax+39 06 94180952
Email: Franca.Morgia@esa.int
============================
* LETTERS TO THE MODERATOR *
============================
(8) WHY BRITAIN'S NEO CENTRE SHOULD BE NAMED IN HONOUR OF ERNST
OEPIK
From S. Fred Singer <singer@sepp.org>
Dear Benny
I suggest naming the National Spaceguard Center after the noted
astronomer
Ernst Oepik and locating it at Armagh Observatory where he worked
and
published the Irish Astronomical Journal.
Many of his pioneering publications dealt with comets and
meteorites. Thanks
to him, Britain's leading NEO experts are based there now.
Since Oepik also did pioneering work on impacts, he published
some of the
first scientific studies about the potential hazards of cosmic
impacts. He
told me that he became interested in the Tunguska impact when he
was an
astronomer at the Alma Ata observatory after WW I.
He worked mostly in Estonia before WW II (with a little time out
at the
Harvard Observatory), came to Hamburg, and from there to Armagh.
He wrote an
enormous amount on everything from meteors to cosmology, as a
sole author.
He also found time to compose music for the piano.
On a personal note: I "discovered" Ernst Opik around
1956 by reading his
papers and was so impressed that I invited him to become a
visiting
professor at the University of Maryland. While there, the US
National
Academy of Sciences awarded him the Leonard Gold Medal. We
interacted
closely for nearly a decade and published on meteorites,
exospheres, and
lunar and planetary atmospheres. I may well be the only person
with whom he
ever coauthored scientific papers. I certainly learned a
great deal from
him.
Best wishes
Fred
P.S. About 30 years ago, I looked into the possibility of
changing the orbit
of Phobos (to save it from a sure death from tidal forces that
cause its
orbit to spiral into Mars). It was picked up by TIME mag at the
time and
made a modest splash.
Since there was plenty of time, the idea was to use a nuclear
reactor as an
energy source and use Phobos material as the propellant.
S. Fred Singer, President
Science & Environmental Policy Project
http://www.sepp.org
**********
"The improver of natural knowledge absolutely refuses to
acknowledge
authority, as such. For him, scepticism is the highest of duties;
blind
faith the one unpardonable sin."
Thomas H. Huxley
**********
"If the facts change, I'll change my opinion. What do you
do, sir? "
J. M. Keynes
***********
=================
(9) ASTEROID OWNERS LIABLE FOR IMPACT DAMAGE?
From Graham Richard Pointer <grp1@st-andrews.ac.uk>
Re: U.S. COMPANY CLAIMS IT OWNS EROS
http://www.OrbDev.com
My office-mates and I were trying to work out the legal
implications - if
Eros crashed into the Earth, could those affected sue this
company for the
damage caused?
Any lawyers out there?
Graham
----------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Richard Pointer
Dept of Physics and Astronomy
North Haugh
St Andrews
Fife
KY16 9SS
Scotland
http://star-www.st-and.ac.uk/~grp1
=========
(10) DIETZ AND GLIKSON ON IMPACT VOLCANISM AND P/Tr
From Hermann Burchard <burchar@mail.math.okstate.edu>
Dear Benny,
two distinguished scientists have suggested impact volcanism in
connection
with mantle plumes and flood basalts in general, and with the
end-Permian
Sibirian traps in particular.
Andrew Glikson, a regular contributor to CCNet, in 1998 explained
impact
causation of flood basalts and mantle plumes by adiabatic
melting, an
expression equivalent to melting by phase transition.
"Oceanic impacts by projectiles Dp>=5 km result in
excavation of
lithosphere and adiabatic melting on scales comparable to oceanic
Large Igneous Provinces (LIP)."
Full text at CCNet 14 Sept 1998.
Robert Dietz, who in 1961 discovered that the Sudbury, Ontario,
volcanic
complex is an astrobleme or impact scar, in 1991 indicated that
the impact
site for the P/Tr extinction is at Noril'sk in Sibiria.
"Although the geologic relationships between
the ore and the country
rock at Noril'sk remain enigmatic, it seems a remarkable Sudbury
look-alike. Their ore mineralogy is similar, including
platimum group
metals, and they are both large scale (one Noril'sk sulfide body
covers
2 sq km and is 20 m thick). Naldrett et al. ... believe
that the
Noril'sk ores and adjacent Siberian plateau basalts are
intimately related
and consanguineous. A similar view was offered by several other
authors
at the 1991 American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting symposium
(Noril'sk
Siberia: Basalts, Intrusions, and Ores). Using argon/argon laser
fusions, Dalrymple et al. ... assigned a date for the ores and
flood basalt
of 249 +- 1 Ma, indistinguishable from the Permian/Triassic
boundary. We,
therefore, suggest that the Noril'sk ores may be of cosmogenic
parenthood
and that this impact also triggered the Siberian plateau basalts.
An
associated event then might be the great extinction of life forms
at
the P/Tr boundary, all tied together as an event
horizon."
Full text at
http://cass.jsc.nasa.gov/pub/meetings/programs/sudburywa.txt
Ranking Noril'sk as a Sudbury look-alike, we must assume that
Dietz
considers this to be the actual impact site. The city is
located at 69.3N
88.0E to the South of the Taimyr peninsula on the Western edge of
the
Sibirian plateau. The edge is marked by the Pyasina river as it
flows past
the city.
Indicating the land-part of the track left behind by the moving
mantle plume
and hotspot, hills stretch from Noril'sk toward the East as far
as the
Kolyma river, bearing gold and diamonds. In Far East
Sibiria, the track
eventually meets up with the Emperor-Hawai'i chain at the
confluence
(cusp shaped) of the Kamchatka and Aleutian tectonic trenches.
From Noril'sk to Kilauea crater on the island of Hawai'i at 19.4N
155.28W
it's a 8970 km distance along a greatest circle. For a P/Tr
age of 250Ma
this amounts to a crustal movement over the mantle of 36 mm/a, a
fairly
typical value. The occasional kink in the track (as near
Midway Island)
does not seem very significant. A slight shortening of the
track due to
subduction is a possibility.
Dietz' term "platinum group metals" presumably includes
iridium? Even though
ir was not ejected to great distances, it seems to be mined at
the impact
site.
Antipodal effects on the Falkland plateau should be considered,
see Duncan
Steele, "Rogue Asteroids...".
Living here in the US, the similarity is striking with the track
of the
mid-Miocene impact hotspot, at present located under Yellowstone
Park. It
left a 10Ma trace of volcanic rocks in Washington (Columbia river
flood
basalts) and Idaho. If the exact impact site is not known, one
would look
for it at the Western edge of the Columbia basalt plateau. In
India, the
Deccan traps may be related to the giant crater near Bombay,
recently found,
again at the Western margin of the plateau. If this was the same
age with
Chicxulub there should be no surprise. We have learned multiple
impacts,
over short or long intervals, to be the rule, not the exception.
Canterbury
monks in 1178 CE may have witnessed about a dozen impacts in
short
succession on the new moon shortly after sunset on one evening,
to mention
an example.
The Chicxulub impact also resulted in a hotspot, again traveling
East at
about 40mm/a, leaving behind its tell-tale chain of volcanic
mountains, the
Greater and Lesser Antilles, covering as it went a distance of
about 2600 km
over 65Ma.
Thanks for considering my remarks. I appreciate Michael Paine's
note, his
web pages were very helpful in gathering up some of the above
facts, thanks!
Regards,
Hermann Burchard
==========
(11) THE BREAK-UP OF PANGEA
From Timo Niroma <timo.niroma@tilmari.pp.fi]
Dear Benny,
Missing iridium and missing crater have been the greatest
obstacles that
have restrained even a debate about the possibility of an impact
251 million
years ago. The event, however, caused the greatest catastrophe on
Earth at
least during the last half billion years. The word catastrophe is
here used
in a neutral fashion, meaning a total change in circumstances in
a very
short time.
I think that both obstacles can easily be dismissed, so that
research and
discussion about this event could freely flow.
I suggest here the scenario of a giant impact, not as the only
possible
hypothesis, but perhaps the most probable one that comes to my
mind as
explaining waht may have happened with a single initiating event.
The missing iridium can be explained in many ways. The first
possibility is
that the impactor did not contain much iridium. The other
possibility is
that most of the iridium has been diluted in the ocean and the
continental
layer of iridium has been dispersed during the hundreds of
millions of years
when the continents have moved, crashed, erosed. The third
possibility is
that the iridium is deep in the Earth if the impactor was huge
enough to go
deep enough in the mantle of the Earth.
The missing crater was the main embarrassment regarding the K/T
impact
proposal, but did not hinder the growing acceptance of the
Alvarez
hypothesis during the 1980's. It took about 10 years to find
Chiczulub. But
for many scientists its discovery was only the logical
confirmation of an
already very probable scenario.
Now, to my opinion, the crater in question is not missing. It is
so huge,
and today so distorted, that we miss the obvious. I suggest that
Pangea, 252
million years ago, was a whole continent, the only continent and
nothing
than a continent. The Tethys sea *is* the crater. It rifted
up Pangea from
deep inside to the coast. This explains why life almost
disappeared both
from land areas and seas. The impacting body must have been huge,
with a
diameter in the 100-500 km in size. It burned the whole continent
making the
nearest mountains for hundreds of kilometers to melt and for a
while behave
like a liquid. The sea boiled in comparable style within hundreds
of
kilometers. The steam and burning lava filled the atmosphere for
a long
time, some boulders probably even escaping from Earth with a
velocity that
caused them never to come back.
The impact ribbed off Pangea first in the southern and northern
part and
thus put into going the still ongoing continental drift, plate
tectonics,
which today shows already some signs of turning reverse.
Antarctica began to
move South, as well as Australia, Europe made a swing to
northwest, tearing
the Mediterranian Sea between it and Africa. The tens of
kilometers deep
liquidifying wave stopped only where today is the mid ridge of
the Atlantic
Ocean, thus pushing the two parts of America wider away. This
rift upwells
still magma from deep.
This scenario also explains the Siberian traps. They consist of
the magma
that the deep diving impactor poured upwards when exploding in
the deep
interior, the beginning of the explosion causing the Tethys.
Now what I hope by suggesting this hypothesis is that scientists
who work
with the dilemma of what happened 251 million years ago consider
these
events also from the above perspective. I would be very grateful
if some of
them could show the possible flaws in my scenario. I would be
more than
happy to further discuss this issue.
Timo Niroma
=============
(12) AND FINALLY: RUSSIAN COMMUNISTS BLAME U.S. FOR PUTIN'S MIR
DECISION
From Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>
[ http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/spacedocumentary/story/0,2763,439632,00.html
]
Sunday, February 18, 2001
Russians beg Putin to save Mir
As the ageing space station nears its watery grave, millions
mourn the
passing of a national status symbol
By Amelia Gentleman in Moscow and Robin McKie, The Observer
To the West, it is a dilapidated rustbucket whose demise cannot
come soon
enough. European and US space officials are already rubbing their
hands. But
to Russia, the Mir space station -- now scheduled to splash into
the Pacific
between 13 and 18 March -- remains a potent symbol of patriotic
pride.
Its destruction is viewed as a betrayal of the nation's
once-glorious space
history. "We will become a banana republic without any
bananas," says
cosmonaut Georgy Grechko, who blames the US for engineering the
death of Mir
and Russia's space programme. "America will siphon off a few
hundred of our
best specialists, but some 100,000 will be out of work."
It costs £150 million a year to keep Mir in orbit, a price
Russia can no
longer afford if it is to participate in the US-led International
Space
Station now being constructed above Earth. Hence Putin's decision
to axe the
craft that has been dubbed Starship Lada by the West, but which
is seen as
'130 tonnes of intellectual metal' by his countrymen.
A poll last week revealed that 67 per cent of Russians oppose the
destruction of Mir. A letter signed by former cosmonauts and
rocket
scientists and 16,000 Muscovites has been handed to Putin. It
claims Mir's
death sentence is 'anti-Russian'.
On Tuesday, the fifteenth anniversary of Mir's launch, thousands
of
demonstrators are expected to protest about its fate, and
feelings will run
high. According to the left-wing daily Soviet Russia, the
government is
planning 'the killing of a living organism'.
The West may recall the station's worst year in 1997 when a fire
and then a
collision with a cargo spaceship nearly destroyed Mir, but
Russians prefer
to remember its other 14 years of success. Nor could the timing
of Mir's end
be worse, for it has coincided with the election of a US
administration
committed to the development of a sophisticated star wars defence
programme.
"Russia's space programme is being destroyed," says
Vyacheslav Tetekin,
leader of the Save Mir campaign. "America has squeezed
everything they
needed and now they are ditching our specialists like unnecessary
ballast."
Such protests are understandable, but ignore a basic fact: that
the
40ft-long space ship, whose bristling solar panels give it the
appearance of
a railway carriage with wings, can no longer function safely.
"The technology is outdated, and we don't have money for
repairs," says
space agency official Alexei Gorbunov.
Worst of all, Mir's giant gyros are broken and the craft can only
hold its
position in space by using its thruster rockets, which burn fuel
at an
alarming rate. Two months ago, engineers at Star City announced
they had had
enough. "We cannot continue with this game -- which I call
Russian
roulette," said one.
An unmanned Progress spacecraft carrying fuel was launched and
docked with
Mir a couple of weeks ago. "Now all the Russians have to do
is let the craft
sink of its own accord until it reaches a critical height of 250
kilometres," said Richard Crowther of the British National
Space Centre. "It
now orbits at 280km but is dropping by more than a kilometre a
day."
Once it has reached 250km, Star City engineers will fire the
Progress
capsule's rockets, causing Mir to slow down rapidly, and plunge
into the
atmosphere. This final burn will be timed precisely to allow Mir
to make a
last sweep over Asia before plummeting into the Pacific.
"In the past, 25 to 30 per cent of large spaceships survive
re-entry," said
Crowther. "We can therefore expect that about 35 tonnes
worth of Mir will
still hit Earth -- at about 120mph -- though not in one lump.
There should
be a spray of bits and pieces that will fall into the sea."
Mir should have reached its 250km re-entry height by now, but has
been saved
by -- of all things -- the sun. "We are going through an
intense period of
solar activity called the Solar Max which heats up the upper
atmosphere,
causing it to rise and drag on Mir and thus slow it down,"
said Crowther.
"But for some mysterious reason that activity stopped a few
weeks ago. The
drag on Mir has been reduced, and this has extended its
life."
The sun's intervention has therefore given Mir an unexpected stay
of
execution, but not one that will soothe the feelings of the
spaceship's
millions of Russian fans.
© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2001
--------------------------------------------------------------------
THE CAMBRIDGE-CONFERENCE NETWORK (CCNet)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The CCNet is a scholarly electronic network. To
subscribe/unsubscribe,
please contact the moderator Benny J Peiser <b.j.peiser@livjm.ac.uk>.
Information circulated on this network is for scholarly and
educational
use only. The attached information may not be copied or
reproduced for
any other purposes without prior permission of the copyright
holders.
The fully indexed archive of the CCNet, from February 1997 on,
can be
found at http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/cccmenu.html
DISCLAIMER: The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed in the
articles and texts and in other CCNet contributions do not
necessarily
reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of the moderator of
this
network.