PLEASE NOTE:
*
CCNet 68/2001 - 18 May 2001
----------------------------
"This was a game that will be unsurpassed in modern times.
You
wouldn't believe it was possible to have so many twists to one
game.
As a former defender I suppose I'm not meant to enjoy this sort
of
contest - nine goals in one match. But I loved it. It was the
best game
you are ever likely to see. It was just unfortunate there had to
be a loser,
but I am glad it wasn't Liverpool. All credit to Alaves who just
wouldn't give up but Liverpool deserved their victory."
--Alan Hansen, on Liverpool's 5:4 UEFA Cup victory over
Alaves, BBC Sport 17 May 2001
"Doug Shull's suggestion of potential discovery on the Moon
and/or
Mars of dinosaur remains ejected from Earth (38th Space Congress,
cited in CCNet 14-05-01) adds a much needed sense of humor to the
otherwise daunting subject of mass extinction. Accepting that
ejection of
solid material from the periphery of large impact craters is
possible,
remnants of surface (living) organic matter or of unconsolidated
bone
beds would tend to be burnt and/or pulverized, thereby retained
within
the Earth's atmosphere. Alternatively, perhaps it is time to
begin a
search for ejected relics of Lunar cheese and Martian green men
on the
Earth surface?"
--Andrew Glikson, Australian National University
"My own favourite theory is that not only were the pyramids
not
simply royal tombs and gateways to the stars, but they also
actually served
the kings before their death as a kind of air raid shelter, to
protect them
from the explosions of these cosmic missiles. The channel within
the
Great Pyramid, pointing in the direction of Orion's belt, could
have been
used to observe the progress of an offending meteor stream,
focusing on the
point in the sky from which the missiles would have appeared to
come."
--Chandra Wickramasinghe, Cardiff University, 17 May 2001
(1) ICES, ROCK, ORGANIC MATERIAL: WHAT IS TITAN REALLY MADE OF?
Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>
(2) DEEP SPACE 1 ON TRACK FOR COMET FLYBY
SpaceDaily, 15 May 2001
(3) WOW: ITALIAN TEAM CLAIMS TO HAVE REVIVED 2 BILLION YEAR OLD
METEORITE
BACTERIA
Space.com, 11 May 2001
(4) FIRST EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON ASTROBIOLOGY
ESA Media Relations <ContactESA@esa.int>
(5) RESEARCHERS UNCOVER EVIDENCE THAT SHEDS LIGHT ON ORIGIN OF
THE PLANET
Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>
(6) SCI-FI WRITER DOUGLAS ADAMS IMMORTALISED IN SPACE
Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>
(7) DOUGLAS ADAMS & ASTEROID (6564) ASHER
Duncan Steel <D.I.Steel@salford.ac.uk>
(8) ORIGINS OF ELEMENTS IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM: IMPLICATIONS OF
POST-1957
OBSERVATIONS
Oliver K. Manuel <oess@umr.edu>
(9) PYRAMIDS SEEN AS STAIRWAYS TO HEAVEN
The Guardian, 14 May 2001
(10) PYRAMID TO PARADISE: WERE THESE ENIGMATIC MONUMENTS AIR-RAID
SHELTERS
AGAINST COSMIC MISSILES?
Chandra Wickramasinghe, Cardiff
University
(11) THE END-TRIASSIC IMPACT CLUSTER AND MASS EXTINCTION
Andrew Glikson <geospec@webone.com.au>
(12) ON EJECTED DINOSAUR RELICS
Andrew Glikson <geospec@webone.com.au>
(13) SPIKES IN THE CO2 RECORD OVER THE PAST 300MY YEARS
Michael Paine <mpaine@tpgi.com.au>
(14) SPECULATING ABOUT IMPACT CRATER RING FORMATION
Eric Farmer <ericf@telect.com>
(15) AND FINALLY: HAGUE AND BLAIR BECOME SPACE INVADER TARGETS
Ananova, 16 May 2001
==========
(1) ICES, ROCK, ORGANIC MATERIAL: WHAT IS TITAN REALLY MADE OF?
From Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>
ESA Science News
http://sci.esa.int
15 May 2001
Ices, rock, organic material -- what is Titan really made of?
Scientists expect to have a much clearer vision of the surface of
Titan, the
largest moon of Saturn, when the Huygens probe touches down on
its surface
in 2004. In the meantime, both ground-based telescopes and space
observatories are contributing to the growing body of information
on the
nature of Titan's surface.
Titan, a planet-sized moon, is of particular interest because it
is
considered to be representative of a pre-biotic state similar to
that of
early Earth.
Methane, after nitrogen, is the most abundant compound in Titan's
atmosphere. Both of these compounds are being continuously broken
apart by
ultraviolet solar photons, energetic electrons from Saturn's
magnetosphere,
and cosmic rays.
The fragments of the parent molecules recombine and form new more
complex
compounds. Photochemical models predict that ethane should be the
main
organic product of these atmospheric reactions.
Ethane and other more complex organics may rain down from the
atmosphere
onto Titan's surface. If this is true, then we would expect to
find huge
seas of ethane on Titan's surface. Up until recently, it was
believed that
the surface of Titan was mainly composed of lakes or oceans of
liquid
hydrocarbons. The remaining dry parts of the surface should also
be covered
with complex organic deposits.
Recent results obtained by ground-based telescopes have confirmed
earlier
observations made by the Hubble Space Telescope. But tantalising
new results
at infrared wavelengths have stirred up the debate about what the
surface of
Titan is really like.
In particular, excellent observing conditions during a recent
observation
campaign with the new adaptive optics system, PUEO, at the
Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) produced images of
excellent quality.
The images were taken in the middle of the methane windows at 1.3
µm and 1.6
µm. Methane absorbs light photons. But, in certain wavelength
ranges, only a
small fraction of the photons coming from the surface is
absorbed. This
allows us to 'see' Titan's surface through these so-called
methane windows.
These results were discussed at the General Assembly of the
European
Geophysical Society (EGS) in Nice in March 2001.
"We have been obtaining data with adaptive optics since
1994," says Athena
Coustenis, an astronomer at the Paris-Meudon observatory and one
of the
scientists involved in the ADONIS (ESO) and HST observation
campaign, "when
both ADONIS at ESO in Chile and HST produced an acceptable image
of Titan.
It was the first to show Titan's surface."
These observations showed the existence of a bright area, which
was highly
contrasted in the ADONIS images, but only recently with PUEO has
it been
possible to analyze the details of this spot at shorter
wavelengths.
"Having a good instrument is not enough, it is also
important to have good
weather, even in Mauna Kea," continued Coustenis.
"Recently, we were lucky
and we obtained diffraction limited images. In addition, another
bright
feature at Titan's Western limb was noticed for the first time.
This
feature might be diagnostic of diurnal effects but requires
further
investigation before its origin can be firmly identified."
A map of Titan's geometrical albedo was also obtained. "From
our albedo
maps, it appears that the darker areas are about 3 times darker
than the
bright spot and they are compatible with a combination of organic
deposits
and ice extents, possibly related to topography," concluded
Coustenis.
Another important feature of the recent CFHT observations was the
acquisition of data at 0.9 µm (another methane window) with the
spectrograph
OASIS, which provides information for the first time at more than
70
different locations on Titan's disk.
Is there lightning in Titan's atmosphere?
Despite the lack of evidence for lightning on Titan, it is still
considered
by many scientists to be a strong possibility. Therefore, ESA's
Huygens
probe has been designed (and tested) to withstand lightning
strikes as it
descends through the Titan atmosphere.
Developing models and improving prediction capabilities for
lightning
phenomena on Titan are important in light of the impact of
lightning strikes
on the Huygens probe. Some of the work in progress in this area
of research
was also discussed at the Nice meeting.
There are basically two possible charging mechanisms on Titan
which could
lead to lightning strikes: charging by free electrons and ions or
charging
by collision.
"Lightning on Titan may be rare because of low solar input,
low temperature,
low gravity, etc. but nevertheless it may be possible," says
Tetsuya Tokano,
a scientist at the Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie,
Universität zu
Köln.
"Methane clouds are necessary for charging, and there is
evidence for
occasional clouds in the troposphere. Once it is formed a cloud
rapidly
attracts a large number of free electrons which are abundant in
Titan's
troposphere. As a consequence, the negative space charge in the
cloud may
cause a cloud-to-ground lightning strike in Titan's lower
troposphere. The
collisional charging mechanism, on the other hand, appears to be
less
efficient since the charge transfer itself may be limited at
Titan's cold
temperatures and no substantial charge redistribution takes place
in the
cloud due to the weak updraft and gravitation," Tokano
concludes.
Are aerosols on Titan sticky?
As part of the Cassini-Huygens mission to Saturn and Titan the
Huygens probe
is set to sample aerosols as it descends through Titan's
atmosphere. During
the descent these aerosol particles may cover the surfaces of the
detectors,
which would prevent Huygens from sampling the surroundings.
Whether this
happens or not depends primarily on the stickiness of the
aerosols, which in
turn is related to the age of the aerosol particles.
Dr Vladimir Dimitrov of the University of Tel Aviv presented a
very
interesting study in which he described how aging of hydrocarbon
aerosols in
Titan's atmosphere occurs and what this implies for the Huygens
Probe.
"Aging and charging of aerosols are very favorable phenomena
with respect to
the functioning of the Huygens probe," said Dimitrov,
"because they
essentially weaken the possibility of damaging the detectors
on-board the
Probe."
In the course of time, the aerosol material changes its
properties, either
spontaneously or as a result of several external factors. As a
consequence,
it becomes much more inert, dense and hard, while becoming less
sticky.
Moreover, external irradiation produces charging of the aerosol
particles,
so that they have the ability to capture external electrons.
"Altogether," concluded Dimitrov, "the combined
effect of aging and charging
at the altitude range where the Huygens probe will operate
decreases the
interference with the measurements by a factor of 50 to 100, and
continuous
trouble free operation of Huygens is ensured."
We must still wait for the best close-up view
With still three years to go before Cassini-Huygens reaches
Titan, the
puzzle over the nature of Titan's surface remains. New
ground-based
observations, and laboratory work, continue to fuel the debate in
the
scientific community about the nature and complexity of its
surface and of
its atmosphere.
Future observations with increased spectral resolution and
adaptive optics
systems are important in order to prepare well for the
Cassini-Huygens
observations. "But we have to be patient," says
Jean-Pierre Lebreton, ESA's
Huygens project scientist. "We have to wait for
Cassini-Huygens to be able
to reveal the secrets of Titan hidden behind the thick orange
haze curtain
that shrouds the atmosphere."
USEFUL LINKS FOR THIS STORY
* Why go to Titan?
http://sci.esa.int/content/doc/a5/1957_.htm
* Some facts about Titan
http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/nineplanets/nineplanets/titan.html
* Titan images obtained with ADONIS at ESO
http://despa.obspm.fr/planeto/titan_adonis.html
* Images of Titan from PUEO at the CFHT
http://despa.obspm.fr/planeto/titan_pueo.html
* New Titan images obtained with the Keck telescope
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/cassini-99b.html
IMAGE CAPTIONS:
[Image 1:
http://sci.esa.int/content/searchimage/searchresult.cfm?aid=12&cid=12&oid=27002&ooid=27046
]
Titan's surface as seen with PUEO on the Canada-France-Hawaii
Telescope.
These images were obtained by Athena Coustenis and colleagues.
Copyright ©
Athena Coustenis et al.
[Image 2:
http://sci.esa.int/content/searchimage/searchresult.cfm?aid=12&cid=12&oid=27002&ooid=15605
]
HST images of Titan's surface. Scientists for the first time have
made
images of the surface of Saturn's giant, haze-shrouded moon,
Titan. They
mapped light and dark features over the surface of the satellite
during
nearly a complete 16-day rotation. One prominent bright area they
discovered
is a surface feature 2,500 miles across, about the size of the
continent of
Australia. Copyright: © UA Lunar and Planetary Laboratory
=========
(2) DEEP SPACE 1 ON TRACK FOR COMET FLYBY
From SpaceDaily, 15 May 2001
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/deep1-01d.html
by Marc D. Rayman
Pasadena - May 15, 2001
As Deep Space 1 continues is cosmic voyage, it is preparing for a
very brief
and extremely daring assignment later this year. If all goes well
for the
next 4 months, on September 22 DS1 will greet comet Borrelly as
the icy body
and the spacecraft flash past each other at 16.5
kilometers/second (more
than 10 miles/second, or 36,900 miles/hour).
While this is a great bonus opportunity to try to gather some
unique and
wondrous information about comets, it is also a very very
challenging and
risky undertaking.
But with a marvelously successful primary mission to its credit
as well as a
remarkably exciting and rewarding extension, the bold challenge
of the comet
encounter is a worthwhile adventure. Comets are believed to be
remnants from
the formation of the solar system, and studying them may shed
light on the
origin and evolution of our solar system and perhaps even on the
evolution
of Earth.
With its motto of "If it isn't impossible, it isn't worth
doing" always in
mind, the very small Deep Space 1 team has been preparing for the
event.
The measurements DS1 will attempt at the comet will be described
in detail
in future logs. In brief, however, the probe will attempt to fly
through the
coma, the cloud of gas and dust surrounding the nucleus, and
measure its
composition.
Then as it closes in to near the center of the coma, it will be
faced with
its greatest challenge -- to obtain pictures and infrared spectra
of the
diminutive nucleus, invisible from Earth because of its size and
the
obscuration by the coma.
The craft will have to locate the nucleus on its own and point
the camera at
it as it streaks by. That would be difficult enough, given that
we can't
tell DS1 exactly where the nucleus is nor what it will look like.
But the
little robot's assignment will be still more challenging because
in the
absence of its star tracker, which failed in November 1999, it
normally has
to stay locked to a reference star to remain stable.
It can't point its camera at a star while it is trying to find
and
photograph the nucleus, so it will have to rely on its gyros,
which provide
approximate measurements of the spacecraft's turns. These gyros
however were
not meant for such a job, and they are not accurate enough to
provide a
stable platform throughout the encounter period.
To get an inkling of just one facet of the problem, suppose
someone were
holding a pair of high-power binoculars for you while you tried
to look
through them. Her hands would not be perfectly steady, and you
would have a
hard time seeing what you wanted. In fact, unless you told her
how to
position the binoculars, she might even move them around enough
that the
object of interest would completely leave your field of view.
DS1 is faced with a similar situation, with the binoculars being
like the
camera, and the gyros being the assistant's hands. But now if you
could tell
your friend how to move the binoculars ("a little to the
right, now lower
them -- no, that's too much") you might be able to guide her
well enough for
you to get a good view.
Some of the new software that was installed in DS1 in March is
designed to
analyze the pictures, look for what might be the nucleus, and
decide how to
move the spacecraft to keep it in the camera's sights.
During the spacecraft's encounter with the comet, it will rely on
the
software and an extremely complex set of carefully timed commands
to execute
the myriad steps necessary to collect its measurements. But how
do we test
all of this?
Of course, we have ground-based simulators of the spacecraft, but
they are
of only limited fidelity. So to make sure we are on the right
track in
developing the commands that will give the probe its best chance
to point
its camera at the comet as it closes in on it, the DS1 control
team
conducted some clever experiments with the spacecraft on May 1
and May 8.
Such tests involve some risk and a great deal of work to prepare
and
execute. The very long hours of hard (but, frankly, incredibly
cool!) work
by the team keep paying off however. In addition, because the
Deep Space 1
project's resources are quite limited, the team's careful
decisions in how
it deals with risky undertakings have been an important
ingredient in the
success of such difficult operations.
After much planning, on May 1 DS1 took advantage of a
coincidental alignment
of itself with two planets to conduct a valuable test of the new
software.
On that date, when DS1 pointed its main antenna to distant Earth,
its camera
ended up pointing to still-more-distant Jupiter.
With controllers thus able to monitor data (of course delayed by
the long
wait for signals to travel from the probe to the second floor of
JPL's Space
Flight Operations Facility on Earth), DS1 used this new software
to keep
Jupiter in the view of its camera for the duration of the test --
over 2
hours. This provided the spacecraft with a rare opportunity to
try to track
a target other than a star, which would have appeared only as a
pinpoint.
Jupiter is around 30,000 times larger than the nucleus of the
comet (whose
actual size is very poorly known) DS1 will meet in September. So
although it
was over 820 million kilometers (510 million miles) from the
craft, the
planet, the largest in our solar system, looked to DS1 about the
same size
that the comet will appear when DS1 is on its final approach,
only about
half an hour before the moment of closest encounter.
This also illustrates part of the difficulty of the encounter --
this comet
nucleus is going to be very tiny and thus difficult to locate!
The software
successfully detected Jupiter (appearing as just a little fuzzy
ball) in the
picture frame and correctly computed compensations for the gyros
to hold
Jupiter in about the right spot.
Jupiter was so far away that its position did not vary during the
test, but
when the spacecraft gets to the vicinity of comet Borrelly, it
will have to
keep turning to keep its camera pointed at the moving target. In
addition,
it will execute many other commands to control its scientific
instruments,
to move and record data in its computer system, to set various
operating
modes of the spacecraft systems, etc.
To rehearse all of that, on May 8 DS1 executed a practice
encounter with
comet Spoof.
This comet exists only in the virtual universe of software (as
well as, of
course, the hearts and minds of the mission operations team), but
DS1 did
not know the difference (and don't tell the impressionable
probe!).
It dutifully followed the sequence of commands, all the while
recording its
own performance for later analysis by engineers. Each time it
took a
picture, the computer file containing the image was intercepted
by a special
routine on board that "painted" a comet nucleus on it.
The software determined how big Spoof should be at that point in
the
encounter, and how much of the portion visible to the spacecraft
would be
illuminated by the Sun. The image file was subsequently sent back
on its
electronic way, and nothing else on board knew that the nucleus
in the
picture was synthetic.
The spacecraft then processed each of these pictures and
exercised the
systems that will be used to try to follow the nucleus during the
encounter.
By using the actual camera on the actual spacecraft, the test
included such
phenomena as unwanted stray light, camera flaws, and cosmic rays
(which can
show up in some pictures and confuse the software); this made the
rehearsal
much more realistic.
The test proved very successful, giving the DS1 team important
information
on the detailed performance of the spacecraft using the software
and the
commands that have been formulated thus far.
This will be important in helping guide our work in designing the
comet
encounter, as we now have a new comparison of the operation of
the genuine
spacecraft with that of the Earth-based simulator. An encore
performance
rehearsal will take place near the end of June.
The Sun, now at the peak of its 11-year cycle of activity, is
spewing forth
much more radiation than usual. Any readers in the vicinity of
Earth are
protected from this by our planet's vast magnetic field, and
those near the
surface have the extra protection of the thick (and mostly
breathable)
atmosphere.
Those of you on several of our solar system's planets may still
be treated
to some lovely auroras these days triggered by the solar
activity, and
observers who are very careful can see Sun spots, some large
enough to be
visible without magnification.
But lonely DS1 does not have a planet's magnetic field or
atmosphere to
shield it from the buffeting of the raging storms on the Sun.
Nevertheless,
much to the relief of the busy and fatigued operations team, it
is managing
to fly smoothly and happily; solar radiation does not appear to
be causing
problems.
As DS1 continues its flight, the thrusting with the ion
propulsion system
has passed several milestones. On March 21, DS1 had accumulated
10,000 hours
of thrusting. This number is not inherently special, but it
certainly does
illustrate the system's fantastic longevity.
On May 1 DS1 had completed enough firing of its ion engine to
coast to the
comet -- we're on target! But as several mission logs have
described, the
spacecraft is so low on its supply of the conventional rocket
fuel known as
hydrazine that it must keep the ion engine thrusting at a low
throttle level
to control its orientation in space. So it will remain at
"impulse power"
for most of the time until shortly before the spacecraft reaches
Borrelly.
DS1 is now about 157 million kilometers, or 97 million miles,
from comet
Borrelly.
Deep Space 1 is 1.9 times as far from Earth as the Sun is and
more than 750
times as far as the moon. At this distance of 290 million
kilometers, or 180
million miles, radio signals, traveling at the universal limit of
the speed
of light, take over 32 minutes to make the round trip.
Copyright 2001, SpaceDaily
============
(3) WOW: ITALIAN TEAM CLAIMS TO HAVE REVIVED 2 BILLION YEAR OLD
METEORITE
BACTERIA
From Space.com, 11 May 2001
http://www.space.com/searchforlife/italian_bacteria_010511.html
By SPACE.com Staff
An Italian team reportedly has found and revived bacteria
harbored in an
ancient meteorite, a finding that points to the existence of
extraterrestrial life but has yet to pass scientific muster.
Bruno D'Argenio of the Italian National Research Council (CNR) in
Naples and
Giuseppe Geraci of the University of Naples discovered the
bacteria, called
"cryms" or cristallomicrobi, within the crystalline
structure of space rocks
found in several parts of the world, the Italian newspaper La
Stampa
reported.
The bacteria could be 2 billion years old and resisted the
extreme pressures
and temperatures of entering Earth's atmosphere while inside the
meteorite,
the researchers say. They publicized their findings at a press
conference to
the Italian Space Agency in Rome, Reuters reported earlier this
week.
The bacteria bear DNA chemistry identical to that within
Earth-based life,
reproduce normally and are sensitive to antibiotics, the
researchers say. In
addition, the reports indicate the cryms were found in several
other Earth
rocks -- which could contradict the claim of extraterrestrial
origins.
If true, the finding would support not only the existence of life
beyond
Earth but a theory that life came here from space, rather than
emerging from
a primordial soup on this planet.
NASA scientist Everett K. Gibson, who has suffered his share of
slings and
arrows for ongoing work on Martian meteorites that can be
interpreted as
bearing signs of fossilized life, was quite skeptical of the
Italian
reports, noting they provided no detail on where the meteorites
were found.
Gibson, a senior scientist at NASA's Johnson Space Center, was
the co-leader
of a group that announced evidence in 1996 that could be
interpreted as
ancient life in a Martian meteorite.
"In this case," Gibson said of the Italian findings,
"there is not enough
evidence that we see from the report to assume anything other
than the
characterization that it's similar to 50 terrestrial rocks,"
Gibson said.
"That strongly suggests that what they are seeing is
something from a
contaminant."
Those who study early life on Earth use eight criteria for
judging whether a
sample is likely to bear signs of life, he said. The toughest
hurdle
requires researchers to demonstrate that the chemistry in their
rock comes
indeed from the rock, not from chemistry the rock has picked up
in its
travels.
The Italian sample quite likely was contaminated by Earth
bacteria or
chemical factors upon arrival, Gibson said, with bacteria borne
via
atmospheric or surface gases.
"It's extremely likely that [incoming meteorite] material
will pick up
contaminants from the Earth," he said. "These are
terrestrial bacteria. So
the burden of proof lies with the investigator to prove that what
he has is
truly indigenous from the sample he is studying."
In an open letter to La Stampa, Ennio Marsella, also of the CNR,
likened his
colleagues' findings to the 1996 discovery. He called the
creatures
"dormant" bacteria with the ability to endure
indefinitely within the
crystalline structure of rocks.
Cryms measure a few ten-thousandths of a millimeter or smaller,
Marsella
said. Extracted from rocks on Earth, they can, "with rather
simple
techniques, once placed in the appropriate conditions,"
regain mobility and
begin to reproduce, he said.
Scientists have long debated the origin of life on Earth, with
life dated
back 3.8 billion years, just half a billion years after the birth
of the
planet. Some researchers believe comets transported life to
Earth, while
others say some form of electromagnetic radiation catalyzed a
combination of
chemicals on Earth to jump-start life.
Copyright 2001, Space.com
===========
(4) FIRST EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON ASTROBIOLOGY
From ESA Media Relations <ContactESA@esa.int>
Paris, 23 May 2001
Press Release
N° 27-2001
First European Workshop on Exo/Astrobiology - ESA/ESRIN, 21
- 23 May 2001
From 21 to 23 May, the first European Workshop on
Exo/Astrobiology will be
taking place at ESA/ESRIN, the European Space Agency
establishment in Italy
(Frascati, near Rome).
The workshop is being organised jointly by the European
Exobiology Network
and the European Space Agency.
Its purpose is to identify the European potential in
exo/astrobiology and
develop new avenues for cooperation and projects in this field,
and more
particularly to strengthen the European network in
exo/astrobiology,
encourage young scientists to participate in this field of
research, and
develop a perspective for longer-term research, especially in
relation to
human missions to Mars.
The workshop will be in six distinct sessions addressing the
following
topics:
· national and international activities in exo/astrobiology,
· life in the extremes, terrestrial analogues for
extraterrestrial habitats
· ingredients and chemistry of primitive life,
· extraterrestrial/extrasolar habitability, and
· nature and search for life in the solar system and beyond, and
· search for life in the Solar system (missions).
In addition to the plenary sessions, group discussions will be
organised in
splinter meetings and poster sessions.
Media representatives are invited to attend the morning
session of the
opening day (Monday 21 May, 09h00 - 13h15). Lunch
will be provided for the
media, and ESA and European scientists will be available for
interviews.
Media representatives wishing to attend are kindly requested to
complete the
attached form and return it by fax to the ESA/ESRIN Communication
Office
(Simonetta Cheli, Fax No: + 39 06 94180352).
More details are available at the following Web address:
http://www.estec.esa.nl/conferences/01C17/index.html
For further information, please contact :
Simonetta Cheli
Head of the Public and Institutional Relations Office
Tel.: + 39 06 94180350
Fax: + 39 06 94180352
=============
(5) RESEARCHERS UNCOVER EVIDENCE THAT SHEDS LIGHT ON ORIGIN OF
THE PLANET
From Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>
Washington University in St. Louis
Contact:
Tony Fitzpatrick, Washington University in St. Louis
tony_fitzpatrick@aismail.wustl.edu,
(314) 935-5272
Clayton Berry, St. Louis University
berrycl@slu.edu, (314)
977-7117
May 14, 2001
St. Louis University, Washington University in St. Louis
researchers uncover
evidence that sheds light on origins of the planet
A Saint Louis University researcher has made a discovery near the
Great Wall
in China that could change the science of plate tectonics and
provide some
clues into how life might have developed on Earth.
The research, a collaborative effort involving Peking University
and
Washington University in St. Louis researchers, was published as
a report in
the May 11, 2001 issue of Science magazine.
It has been widely held that plate tectonics, or the motion of
plates and
continents, dates back 1.9 billion years. Timothy Kusky, Ph.D.,
professor of
geology at St. Louis University, is part of a group of geologists
who
believe the plates began moving much sooner.
Kusky now believes he has the data to prove the theory. Last
summer, he
discovered the oldest complete section of oceanic sea floor on
the planet,
which is more than 500 million years older than previously
documented. When
he returned, he sought the assistance of Robert Tucker, Ph.D.,
associate
professor of earth and planetary science at Washington University
in St.
Louis, to date the rare samples.
According to Tucker, the rocks are 2.5 billion years old and date
back to
Earth's earliest geologic time period, known as the Archean. The
rocks are
remarkably similar to much younger volcanic rocks that erupted on
the sea
floor in the process of sea floor spreading. For decades,
geologists have
debated whether plate tectonics operated in the Archean period.
Those who
have argued against that theory have cited the lack of any
Archean
ophiolites as their main line of evidence that plate tectonics
did not occur
on the early Earth. Ophiolites are rock structures formed on the
sea floor
when continents collide.
"This discovery shows that the plate tectonic forces that
create oceanic
crust on the Earth today were in operation more than 2.5 billion
years ago,"
Kusky said.
Kusky said the findings could have a more far-reaching effect on
theories
related to the development of life on the planet. Scientists
believe life on
Earth during the Archean period consisted mainly of single-celled
organisms
in the oceans. Just when they evolved into more complex organisms
has been
contested for years.
"Because hot volcanic vents on the sea floor may have
provided the nutrients
and temperatures needed for life to flourish and develop, it's
possible that
life developed and diversified around these vents as plate
tectonics began,"
Kusky said.
Kusky and Dr. Jiang-Hai Li of Peking University in Beijing made
the
discovery in a mountain belt in the Eastern Hebei Province, which
is located
only a few miles from the Great Wall.
==========
(6) SCI-FI WRITER DOUGLAS ADAMS IMMORTALISED IN SPACE
From Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>
From Agence France-Presse, 15 May 2001
[ http://sg.news.yahoo.com/010515/1/p9vw.html
]
Tuesday, May 15, 2001, 12:39 PM EDT
Sci-fi writer Douglas Adams immortalised in space
PARIS (AFP) -- In a coincidence that could have been taken
straight from one
of his quirky novels, on the day writer Douglas Adams died, an
international
space agency named an asteroid Arthurdent, from a character from
his
best-known work, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the
Galaxy."
The Minor Planet Center, a branch of the International
Astronomical Union
(IAU), made the announcement on Friday in an e-mail circular, the
same day
the British author died, a spokesman for the Center, in
Cambridge,
Massachusetts, told AFP by phone Tuesday.
Adams, who died aged just 49, had a worldwide following for his
wry,
inventive style, which poked gentle fun at human self-importance
as well as
science fiction itself.
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" was spawned as a
BBC radio play in
1978 and blossomed into a TV show, a novel and sequels, as well
as plans to
turn the tale into a Hollywood movie.
Arthur Dent, one of its central characters, is a mild-mannered
Englishman
who is rescued from Earth seconds before it is destroyed to make
way for a
hyperspace bypass.
The asteroid's name was proposed by Felix Hormuth, an astronomer
at
Germany's Starkenburg Observatory, which spotted the space rock
on February
7, 1998, the specialist website space.com said.
The Minor Planet Center announcement reads: "The Earthling
Arthur Dent is
confronted with the adversities of life, the universe and
everything in a
highly amusing and entertaining way in Douglas Adams' famous
five-volume
trilogy The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy."
One of the Center's roles is to assign names to new asteroids,
comets and
other orbiting rocks.
Adams died in Santa Barbara, California, following a heart
attack.
Copyright © 2001 Agence France-Presse. All rights reserved.
See also:
DOUGLAS ADAMS' LEGACY LIVES ON IN ASTEROID
From Space.com, 14 May 2001
http://www.space.com/news/adams_obituary_010514.html
DOUGLAS ADAMS: IMORTALISED IN STONE
From New Scientist, 14 May 2001
http://www.newscientist.com/dailynews/news.jsp?id=ns9999730
============
(7) DOUGLAS ADAMS & ASTEROID (6564) ASHER
From Duncan Steel <D.I.Steel@salford.ac.uk>
Dear Benny,
The words of the late lamented Douglas Adams have appeared much
earlier in a
citation for a minor planet (asteroid) name; in fact one named in
honour of
a CCNet subscriber, as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the Minor Planet Circulars of 1997 February 22:
(6564) Asher = 1992 BB
Discovered 1992 Jan. 25 by R. H.
McNaught at Siding Spring.
Named in honor of David John Asher (b.
1966), researcher on the
dynamics of the small bodies in the solar system. Born in
Scotland, Asher
took degrees at the universities of Cambridge, Oxford and
Edinburgh.
Following this, he took the words of Douglas Adams in 'The
Hitchhiker's
Guide to the Galaxy' to heart - "With a degree in maths, and
another in
astrophysics, it was either that or back to the dole queue on
Monday" - and
moved to Australia, where he spent two years at the
Anglo-Australian
Observatory. He is currently working at the National Astronomical
Observatory in Japan. Name proposed by the discoverer following a
suggestion
by D. I. Steel, who prepared the citation.
---------------
David does indeed still work part of the year in Japan, at the
Bisei
Spaceguard Center, but he is also affiliated with the Armagh
Observatory in
Northern Ireland.
I might add that when 1991 DA (now catalogued as 5335 Damocles)
was
discovered, I thought it a sufficiently bizarre object to suggest
the name
"Dadams" (so as to avoid confusion with John Couch
Adams etc.), especially
because the preliminary designation gave Douglas Adams' initials.
Kind regards,
Duncan Steel
===========
(8) ORIGINS OF ELEMENTS IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM: IMPLICATIONS OF
POST-1957
OBSERVATIONS
From Oliver K. Manuel <oess@umr.edu>
Dear Colleagues:
Please forgive this unsolicited message to inform you that the
above
Proceedings have finally been published and are now being
distributed. One
participant, Dr. R. Ganapathy <Ganapathy39@aol.com>,
has received his copy
and seems pleased with the final product.
These are Proceedings of the ACS Symposium organized by
Glenn Seaborg and
me in 1999, shortly before his death. It provides a good
cross-section of
opinions on this important subject at the end of the 20th Century
from
internationally recognized leaders in nuclear physics, nuclear
chemistry,
astronomy, geology, astrophysics, planetary and space sciences.
The link for the book's homepage is:
http://www.wkap.nl/book.htm/0-306-46562-0
Please help us get this book into the hands of as many readers as
possible.
They can order it online from there. Or they can call customer
service at 1
866-269-9527.
The book is being released by:
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
233 Spring Street, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10013
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
--
***************************
Oliver K. Manuel, Professor
University of Missouri
Department of Chemistry
Rolla, MO 65401-0249
Phone: 573-341-4420 or -4344
FAX: 573-341-6033
E-mail: oess@umr.edu
http://www.umr.edu/~om/
***************************
==========
(9) PYRAMIDS SEEN AS STAIRWAYS TO HEAVEN
From The Guardian, 14 May 2001
http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,490307,00.html
Pharoahs used monuments as launch pads to the afterlife, says
scientist
Tim Radford, science editor
Monday May 14, 2001
The Guardian
The pyramids of Egypt could be explained as symbolic stairways to
the stars,
according to a British scientist. And - in a twist that will
delight New Age
believers in mysterious energies and alien spacecraft - the
inspiration for
the pyramids might indeed have arrived from outer space, in the
form of a
meteorite.
Toby Wilkinson, an Egyptologist based at Cambridge University,
told a
conference over the weekend that some of his theory was
"deliberately
controversial, provocative, but tantalising".
He argued, from evidence of the orientation of the pyramids -
always to the
northern pole star - and from the names given to estates to
finance funerary
cults, and the shape of the pyramids themselves, that they could
be seen as
launch pads for the pharaoh's journey to the afterlife among the
stars.
"Circumpolar stars are a very good metaphor for the
afterlife because when
viewed, they never seem to set: they simply rotate around the
pole star.
They are the undying stars, or in Egyptian terminology, the
Indestructibles,
a perfect destination for the soul of the dead king," he
told a Bloomsbury
archaeological summer school at University College London.
Pyramid structures extend from the north of Egypt to the Sudan,
and they
were built over thousands of years. "Where are all the steps
that led up to
pyramid building?" he asked. "We stand marvelling at
these monuments and
they seem to have appeared almost from nowhere, but clearly
something like
that cannot be put up overnight without the infrastructure in
place."
This infrastructure included royal command of the economy,
systematic
taxation, a body of experience in public works and increasing
mastery of
stone as a building material. There had also to be religious or
political
motivation. Dr Wilkinson traced the rise of a professional civil
service in
seals, documents and grave inscriptions dating back almost to
3,000BC, and
the continuing evidence of Egyptian belief not only in an
afterlife, but in
death itself as a journey.
Kate Spence, a Cambridge colleague, had demonstrated in a paper
last year
that from the first, the pyramids were all precisely oriented
towards the
northern stars. There were further clues in the names, which were
crucially
important in ancient Egyptian culture. One pyramid was explicitly
called
"the gleaming". Another was called "the pyramid
that is a star". From the
1st dynasty onwards - long before the pyramids were built - kings
had
founded estates to finance their tomb cults: one of these was
explicitly
called "Horus (that is, the king) rises as a star".
"What clearer exposition could we have of the ideology
surrounding a king's
afterlife than that?" Dr Wilkinson asked.
Tombs of the first dynasties were concealed by mounds of earth,
seen as
symbols of rebirth or resurrection. The first pyramid - the step
pyramid at
Saqqara, built in the 3rd dynasty - had its altar to the north,
and the ramp
down into its subterranean chambers started from the north face.
"It can also be seen as a ramp from the burial
chamber," he said. "Because
if you stand in the burial chamber underneath, and look up this
entrance
ramp, you are looking at the northern sky. And this is perhaps a
launch pad
for the king's spirit, to eject him straight to the northern
stars where he
hopes to spend his afterlife."
Fourth dynasty pyramids - including the Great Pyramid and others
on the Giza
plateau - were very carefully oriented towards the stars. Could
they have
been modelled on stars?
"What does a star look like in three dimensions? We could
only know that if
we had a star that has fallen to Earth for us to look at. A
meteorite,
perhaps, a shooting star that has literally come down to
Earth."
He had a candidate: a stone - long since lost - that had been
revered at the
temple of Heliopolis in the fourth dynasty. It was known as the
Benben
stone, and it was represented in inscriptions as conical or
pyramid-shaped.
Significantly, the Egyptian word for the capstone, the uppermost
stone on a
pyramid, was "benbenet" or little benben. The high
priest at Heliopolis was
called "greatest of observers", a title that had
astronomical links.
"Could it have been that the Benben stone itself was a
meteorite? A signal
from the celestial realm to the earthly realm, something that is
worshipped
as a sign from the heavens? Well, it is a rather tantalising
suggestion," Dr
Wilkinson said.
"I'm not a geologist, and wouldn't claim to be, but there is
a particular
kind of meteorite, a rare kind of meteorite, which as it enters
the
atmosphere, is formed into a shape that startlingly resembles a
pyramid.
Could the benben stone have been such a stone? Could it have been
a shooting
star that had fallen to earth and been worshipped as a sign from
the
heavens?"
Copyright 2001, The Guardian
========
(10) PYRAMID TO PARADISE: WERE THESE ENIGMATIC MONUMENTS AIR-RAID
SHELTERS
AGAINST COSMIC MISSILES?
From The Daily Mail, 15 May 2001, p. 11
By Chandra Wickramasinghe, Cardiff University
FOR thousands of years they have stood in the desert, inspiring
and
perplexing generations of explorers. The pyramids, utterly simple
and
profoundly beguiling, remain the greatest enigma of human
endeavour.
Over the years the intricate mechanics of these astonishing
constructions
have been revealed. But like all great enigmas, the more we
discover about
them the more mysterious they become. And the greatest mystery of
all is why
were they built at all?
Were the pyramids simply burial chambers for megalomaniac
pharaohs, eager to
carve out the flashiest of all resting places in the Egyptian
desert? Or
were they built with a deeper and possibly cosmic meaning?
There is now mounting evidence to support the latest tantalising
theory,
raised again this week, that they were constructed as stairways
to the
stars, inspired by meteorites from space.
Toby Wilkinson, an Egyptologist based at Cambridge University,
told a
conference at University College London over the weekend that,
judging from
the orientation and shapes of the pyramids, their mystical
purpose was to
provide a direct highway to the heavens, a spiritual launch pad
for the
pharaoh's journey to the afterlife.
No one has convincingly unlocked this mystery of the pyramids,
that has
intrigued historians, archaeologists and explorers - not to
mention the
public - for many years. This week the sequel to the blockbuster
film The
Mummy will open, yet another testimony of the enduring hold the
pyramids
have over us.
As scholars turn their attention to the question that has haunted
us since
the historian Herodotus wrote the first 'traveller's guide' to
the pyramids
in the fifth century BC, it is now the turn of astronomers to try
and
explain their significance.
The time at which the pyramids were built, from around 2800BC,
may offer the
greatest clue to their celestial importance. It was an era when
our planet
was under regular attack from the skies in the form of cosmic
missiles,
meteorites and pieces of comets that crashed through the skies.
They landed on earth causing many different forms of devastation
and were an
Egyptian obsession. Their impact was comparable to an event that
took place
in 1908, when an object of about 100 metres entered the
atmosphere over
Siberia.
A great fireball passed low over the town of Kirensk, outshining
the sun,
and exploded about 8kms above a remote part of Siberia. It was
seen as far
as 1,000km away and the explosive power was equivalent to more
than 650
Hiroshima bombs.
At the time of the building of the pyramids such events were
almost
certainly a regular occurrence, bringing massive floods and
destruction in
their wake. The public was deeply fearful of the power of the
star-filled
skies.
The construction of the three most famous pyramids at Giza began
with the
mighty Pharaoh Khufu, who built the Great Pyramid in around
2.500BC. This
stupendous structure covering 13 acres is quite simply the most
astonishing
engineering feat in history. It took 4,000 people to move the
6million tons
of precisely cut quarry stone, and Khufu relied on systematic
taxation to
raise the funds to build them. He was also dependent on the
extraordinary
masonry skills and labour of his people who followed intricate
specifications on the positioning of the pyramids.
The traditional theory that the pyramids were simply royal tombs
for the
pharaohs, who were seen as living gods, has always raised more
questions
than it has answered.
However revered the pharaohs may have been, why was there such a
huge input
of energy, skill and money into the pyramids? And why were they
constructed
on such precise alignments with points of the compass? A
construction
engineer and amateur Egyptologist, Robert Bauval, first pointed
out that
overhead photographs of the three Giza pyramids show an
astounding
similarity to the disposition of the three brightest stars in
Orion's belt.
This includes the distances between the pyramids and their size
in relation
to the brightness of the stars. It even includes the minute
detail of a kink
in the lines connecting the pyramids that matches a similar kink
in the
lines joining the stars in the sky.
The link to the Orion belt shows up even more strikingly in the
alignment of
a passage or channel that passes through the Great Pyramid,
connecting the
King's chamber to the outside world.
Astronomers have calculated that at about the time the pyramid
was built,
this channel would have pointed precisely in the direction of the
brightest
star in Orion's belt, when the star rose to its highest point in
the sky.
Another enticing hint that they were built as stairways to the
stars was
uncovered by accident in 1879, by an Arab foreman. When he
followed a jackal
into the base of a pyramid at Saqqara, he was led into a chamber
covered in
a mass of exquisite carved hieroglyphics, decorated with
turquoise and gold.
These pyramid texts were initially dismissed by Egyptologists as
'magical
charms and fragments of old myths.' Their message was largely
ignored.
But the texts backed up Bauval's findings. Over and over, they
stressed the
belief: 'O king, you are this Great Star, Companion of
Orion...behold,
Osiris has come as Orion...O king, the sky conceives you with
Orion.'
It seems almost certain that these pyramids, where the star faith
was
inscribed in obsessive detail, were indeed far more than mere
hollow tombs
and memorials. They were both a replica of the astral destination
of a dead
Pharaoh and a launching pad to speed his soul starward.
Their link to the rock filled skies is clear. Orion's belt also
appeared to
be the source of the meteors and deadly missiles that were a
constant threat
to the Egyptian people.
My own favourite theory is that not only were the pyramids not
simply royal
tombs and gateways to the stars, but they also actually served
the kings
before their death as a kind of air raid shelter, to protect them
from the
explosions of these cosmic missiles.
The channel within the Great Pyramid, pointing in the direction
of Orion's
belt, could have been used to observe the progress of an
offending meteor
stream, focusing on the point in the sky from which the missiles
would have
appeared to come.
Other archaeological discoveries point to the remains of cosmic
air-raid
shelters for lesser mortals during the Old Kingdom of ancient
Egypt, which
collapsed in around 2300BC. Groups of bodies were discovered with
arms over
their heads, bodies in contorted positions, strongly suggesting
that they
were the hapless victims of an unexpected assault from the skies.
This theory is also supported by a pioneering new science,
dendrochronology,
the study of the thickness of tree rings at different times in
the past. The
thinning of tree rings has been discovered in oaks across the
entire period
2354 to 2345BC which comes close to the final decades of the Old
Kingdom.
The most simple explanation is due to the frequent arrival of
cometary
missiles, that would have dusted the atmosphere and dimmed the
light from
the sun, depriving trees of much needed energy. Here is yet
further evidence
that the Egyptians were under a regular torrent of missiles from
above. One
thing is certain. The pyramids were planned and built with
meticulous care
and their construction involved an effort that comes close to
being
superhuman. The Giza pyramids have survived for 5,000 years. Yet
they will
never entirely give up their mystery. Instead, they will continue
to keep
teaching each generation new lessons about human endeavour and
our
relationship with the universe.
The ancient Egyptians were ever wary of the skies, keeping
constant watch
for imminent danger. In the year 2001 we are at long last making
some
progress in recognising that such threats are not entirely a
thing of the
past.
Again we are turning our heads skywards, and looking out for
possible
dangers under the Spaceguard programme. If they can teach us
anything, it is
humility.
[Chandra Wickramasinghe's new book Cosmic Dragons is published by
Souvenir
Press in September]
Copyright 2001, Daily Mail, London
============================
* LETTERS TO THE MODERATOR *
============================
(11) THE END-TRIASSIC IMPACT CLUSTER AND MASS EXTINCTION
From Andrew Glikson <geospec@webone.com.au>
Dear Benny,
I refer to items regarding the T-J boundary mass extinction
(CCNet
11-05-01), where Peter Ward is quoted as stating "There is
no definitive
evidence yet on what caused the demise of so many species".
The end-Triassic constitutes a major extraterrestrial bombardment
period,
the cluster consisting of Manicouagan (Quebec; D=100 km; 212+/-2
Ma),
Puchezh-Katunki (Russia; D=80 km; 220+/-10 Ma), Saint Martin
(Manitoba; D=40
km; 220+/-32 Ma), and Redwing (Dakota; D=9 km; 200+/-25 Ma).
The end-Triassic is also the time of onset of the Atlantic
oceanic split,
accompanied by intense volcanic activity along the incipient
ocean
rift/suture, as well as rifting in several other parts of the
Earth (V.
Courtillot, C. Jaupart, I. Manughetti, P. Tapponnier, J. Besse.
On causal
links between flood basalts and continental breakup. Earth
Planet. Sci.
Lett. 166 (1999) 177-196. W.J. Morgan, Hotspot tracks and the
opening of the
Atlantic and Indian oceans. in: C. Emiliani (Ed.), The Sea, vol.
7, Wiley
Interscience. New York, 1981, pp. 443-487). These papers
interpret the
volcanism as due to endogenic mantle plumes, however it is
possible the
volcanic activity rifting and ocean splitting may have been
triggered by the
impacts (Glikson, 1999; Glikson, in press).
A major extinction at the end-Triassic has been established
earlier (Newell,
1967; Stanley, 1987; Sepkoski, 1993; Hallam, 1997). This is
supported by the
organic carbon and light carbon enrichment (the so-called
"graveyard shift")
reported by Ward et al. (2001), a diagnostic signature of
extinction also
observed along several other impact boundaries (Frasnian-Famenian
[late
Devonian], Permian-Triassic, K-T). Genetic links between the
impact cluster
and the mass extinction remain a distinct possibility to be
tested by
further precise isotopic age determinations of the above impact
craters.
Andrew Glikson
Australian National University
Canberra, ACT 0200
14-05-01
=============
(12) ON EJECTED DINOSAUR RELICS
From Andrew Glikson <geospec@webone.com.au>
Dear Benny,
Doug Shull's suggestion of potential discovery on the Moon and/or
Mars of
dinosaur remains ejected from Earth (38th Space Congress, cited
in CCNet
14-05-01) adds a much needed sense of humor to the otherwise
daunting
subject of mass extinction. Accepting that ejection of solid
material from
the periphery of large impact craters is possible, remnants of
surface
(living) organic matter or of unconsolidated bone beds would tend
to be
burnt and/or pulverized, thereby retained within the Earth's
atmosphere.
Alternatively, perhaps it is time to begin a search for ejected
relics of
Lunar cheese and Martian green men on the Earth surface?
Andrew Glikson
15-05-01
==============
(13) SPIKES IN THE CO2 RECORD OVER THE PAST 300MY YEARS
From Michael Paine <mpaine@tpgi.com.au>
Dear Benny
The latest issue of Nature (17 May 01) has a paper with an
analysis of
atmospheric CO2 concentrations over the past 300 million years.
Unusually,
the method appears to be able to detect spikes in the record. The
author
makes reference to a spike at the KT boundary and attributes it
to the
Yucatan impact. He also refers to spikes at other major
boundaries but
attributes them to methane outbursts (see extract below). I would
think
post-impact effects are just as likely a cause of the spikes as
methane.
Indeed, as raised previously on CCNet, one possible consequence
of a large
impact is the disturbance of methane hydrates in the oceans.
regards
Michael Paine
Nature 411, 287-290
http://www.nature.com/nature/links/010517/010517-1.html
A 300-million-year record of atmospheric carbon dioxide from
fossil plant
cuticles
GREGORY J. RETALLACK
...
The cuticular time series (Fig. 4b) shows numerous transient
excursions to
very high CO2
(>2,000 p.p.m.v.). High-resolution studies of the SI minimum
in fossil
Ginkgo and cycad leaves across the Triassic-Jurassic boundary
(200 Myr ago;
ref. 20) in Greenland and Sweden indicates a transient CO2 spike
coincident
with excursion to isotopically lighter carbon (13Corg) of the
same leaves,
and mass extinction (claiming Lepidopteris among others)21. Other
CO2 and
carbon isotopic transients following mass extinction of the
earliest
Triassic (250 Myr ago), and faunal overturn of the early Jurassic
period
(190 Myr ago), early Cretaceous period (117 Myr ago) and late
Palaeocene
epoch (55 Myr ago), have been related to catastrophic outbursts
of
isotopically light methane from permafrost and marine hydrate
reservoirs8,
9, 22. Yet another CO2 spike at the
Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary is coincident with an excursion to
lighter
carbon isotopic values on land and in the sea, asteroid impact in
Yucatan,
and the mass extinctions that claimed dinosaurs and ammonites23.
Transient
CO2 maxima in the cuticular time series (Fig. 4a, b) represent
strong perturbations of the carbon cycle. There are significant
discrepancies between cuticular estimates of atmospheric CO2
(Fig. 4a, b)
and estimates based on the carbon isotopic composition of
palaeosol
carbonates (Fig. 4c), which indicate CO2 minima (including even
negative
concentrations) at 250 Myr ago (earliest Triassic), 190 Myr ago
(early
Jurassic), 117 Myr ago (early Cretaceous) and 55 Myr ago (latest
Palaeocene)3. The timing of these events may be a clue to reasons
for the
discrepancies, because carbon isotopic studies indicate that
these were
times of catastrophic release of isotopically light methane from
permafrost
and marine gas-hydrate reservoirs8, 9, 22. Once in the
atmosphere, methane
is oxidized within 2-7 years to carbon dioxide, which retains the
unusual
isotopic signature of gas-hydrate reservoirs isolated from global
surficial
systems24. Atmospheric additions of isotopically light methane
may also
explain why the palaeosol isotopic palaeobarometer3 and
high-resolution
carbon isotopic studies of deep oceanic organic matter4 failed to
detect the
high CO2 levels and warm palaeoclimate of the middle Miocene,
which is
evident from the few Miocene results presented here (Figs 2, 4a,
b), as well
as from studies of foraminifera25, plants26, palaeosols27 and
oxygen
isotopic composition of marine shells ... 2001 © Macmillan
Publishers Ltd.
===========
(14) SPECULATING ABOUT IMPACT CRATER RING FORMATION
From Eric Farmer <ericf@telect.com>
Dear Dr. Peiser,
In regards to the following article which appeared on space.com
in November
of 2000 I have a possible idea to be considered.
Mystery of the Chicxulub Crater: Animation Shows Liquid Impact
Many years ago, my father taught me how to make a type of
homemade fudge. To
get the proper texture, the hot mixture was poured onto a marble
slab and
allowed to cool slightly. It was then worked with metal paddles
until it was
in a thick ropey consistency. At a certain point in this process
the entire
mixture would suddenly begin to crystallize at a molecular level
and
abruptly harden leaving waves and ripples frozen much like the
rock
formations in impact craters. Is it possible that we are seeing a
process
similar to this candy making, occurring in asteroid impacts? Feel
free to
contact me if any of this is remotely possible and you wish to
discuss it
further. Good luck in all your endeavors!
Best regards,
Eric Farmer, Online Communications
Telect, Inc. - 2111 N. Molter Road, Liberty Lake, WA 99019
Tel: 509.893.4357 or
800.458.4501 e-mail ericf@telect.com
Fax: 509.344.4357
=============
(15) AND FINALLY: HAGUE AND BLAIR BECOME SPACE INVADER TARGETS
From Ananova, 16 May 2001
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_294805.html
Online gaming site Friendly Giants has launched a General
Election version
of Space Invaders.
Election Invaders comes in two versions allowing players to
choose which
politicians they blast.
Labour supporters can choose to shoot a swarm of Hagues,
Portillos and
Widdicombes. Tories can blast animated Blairs, Browns and
Prescotts.
Bagging an elusive Harold Wilson or rogue Margaret Thatcher nets
players a
bonus score.
The game (http://www.friendlygiants.com/games/arcade/election_invaders.html)
- which is free to play - will be online until June 7.
MODEARTOR'S NOTE: In a related development, Ananova reports that
the Deputy
Prime Minister terribly misunderstood the rules of the new
election game
when he blasted another player yesterday: "John Prescott has
punched in the
face a protester who threw an egg at him. The Deputy Prime
Minister hit the
protestor with a straight left in the face after being hit by the
protester
with an egg."
(http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_295555.html?menu=news.latestheadlines.
uknews). So much for the true meaning of the "stiffer upper
lip" approach to
voter canvassing :-) BJP
-------------------------------------------------------------------
THE CAMBRIDGE-CONFERENCE NETWORK (CCNet)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The CCNet is a scholarly electronic network. To
subscribe/unsubscribe,
please contact the moderator Benny J Peiser <b.j.peiser@livjm.ac.uk>.
Information circulated on this network is for scholarly and
educational use
only. The attached information may not be copied or reproduced
for
any other purposes without prior permission of the copyright
holders. The
fully indexed archive of the CCNet, from February 1997 on, can be
found at
http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/cccmenu.html
DISCLAIMER: The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed in the
articles
and texts and in other CCNet contributions do not
necessarily reflect the
opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of the moderator of this
network.