PLEASE NOTE:
*
CCNet 70/2001 - 22 May 2001
----------------------------
"About the time of the Hale-Bopp appearance in 2213 BC,
there seems
to have been a widespread collapse of ancient civilization,
followed by an
apparent lengthy dark age. So I wrote up the following and sent
it
around to a few scientists who had commented on the comet, and to
several publications. I got almost no response, and as far as I
know, it was
never published. It seems like a good enough idea for research
into
idea-generation to include here. [...] Not only did two great
ancient
civilizations suddenly collapse and enter into chaos for over a
century
- sinisterly coincident with the previous appearance of comet
Hale-Bopp - a cataclysmic event, followed by a serious sudden
temporary
climate change, appears to have taken place at the onset of the
collapse. Did some large part of comet Hale-Bopp collide with our
delicate small blue planet in 2213 BC? Clear in our present
memory are
those remarkable Earth-based and space telescope photographs of
Comet
Shoemaker-Levy, broken up into a string of giant objects,
serially colliding
with the giant planet Jupiter between July 16 and July 22, 1994.
Is it
possible that the comet Hale-Bopp we saw for a month in the
spring of
1997 is only a part of a once larger comet that appeared in 2213
BC?
Might some of the rest of that comet now be part of the matter of
our
planet Earth after having collided with it in 2213 BC?"
--Tom Slattery, About Ancient/Classical History, 21 May 2001
(1) COMET CATASTOPHE: A SPECULATIVE FEATURE BY TOM SLATTERY
Robert Clements <Robert.Clements@dva.gov.au>
(2) MISSING CARBON-2 MOLECULE HOLDS CLUES TO COMET'S ORIGIN
Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>
(3) COPYCAT COMET CRACKS INTO THREE PIECES, MAYBE MORE
Space.com, 21 May 2001
(4) COMET'S DEMISE REVERSES 'DIRTY SNOWBALL' THEORY
Los Angeles Times, 21 May 2001
(5) WHAT WE LEARNED FROM COMET LINEAR
John Wagoner <stargate@astromax.com>
(6) WILD WIDE UNIVERSE
The Hindu, 21 May 2001
(7) COMET C/1999 S4 (LINEAR)
Comets & Meteor Showers
(8) PYRAMIDS IN THE SKY
Duncan Steel <D.I.Steel@salford.ac.uk>
(9) SHAPE OF PYRAMIDS
Rolf Sinclair <rolf@santafe.edu>
(10) IMPACTS & HUMAN EVOLUTION
Worth Crouch <doagain@jps.net>
(11) MORE OBSERVATIONS OF SHOEMAKER-LEVY 9 IMPACT
de Pater I, Brecht SH: SL9 impacts: VLA
high-resolution observations at
lambda=20 cm
(12) MODIFICATION OF THE JOVIAN RADIATION BELT BY SHOEMAKER-LEVY
9
Brecht SH, de Pater I, Larson DJ, Pesses
ME
(13) THE SHOEMAKER-LEVY 9 IMPACT & ENHANCED RADIAL DIFFUSION
de Pater I, Brecht SH: SL9 impacts and
simulations of enhanced radial
diffusion
(14) FORCED PRECESSION MODELS FOR SIX ERRATIC COMETS
Krolikowska M, Sitarski G, Szutowicz S:
Forced precession models for
six erratic comets
(15) THE ORBIT EVOLUTION OF 32 PLUTINOS OVER 100 MILLION YEARS
Wan XS, Huang TY: The orbit evolution of
32 plutinos over 100 million
year
(16) THE CHEMISTRY OF INTERSTELLAR SPACE
Herbst E: The chemistry of interstellar
space
========
(1) COMET CATASTOPHE: A SPECULATIVE FEATURE BY TOM SLATTERY
From Robert Clements <Robert.Clements@dva.gov.au>
As posted on About Ancient/Classical History
From N.S. Gill, your Guide to Ancient/Classical History
<http://ancienthistory.about.com>
May 21, 2001
Volume V Issue 21 ISSN: 1521-9232
GUEST FEATURE
COMET CATASTOPHE. A SPECULATIVE FEATURE BY TOM SLATTERY
"Did our ancient ancestors get bopped by a fragment of
Hale-Bopp? If so,
where did it hit? And: might there be another fragment following
Hale-Bopp
out there that could intersect with our planet's orbit?
Again?"
http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/bl/bl_slattery_comet.htm
About the time of the Hale-Bopp appearance in 2213 BC, there
seems to have
been a widespread collapse of ancient civilization, followed by
an apparent
lengthy dark age. So I wrote up the following and sent it around
to a few
scientists who had commented on the comet, and to several
publications. I
got almost no response, and as far as I know, it was never
published. It
seems like a good enough idea for research into idea-generation
to include
here.
COMET-CAUSED COLLAPSE OF THIRD MILLENNIUM BC CIVILIZATIONS?
As the newly discovered Comet Hale-Bopp grew brighter in the
early spring of
1997 and eventually made a remarkable nightly appearance lasting
about a
month, speculation about its calculated previous appearance in
2213 BC and
resultant effects on our early ancestors seeing it at dawn of
civilization
began to be exchanged. But nothing could be found in the scant
written
records of these early civilizations.
Newsweek, March 24, 1997, page 60, noted a scramble to discover
contemporary
mention of the comet's last appearance over four millennia ago
had turned up
nothing in the spotty records of ancient China, the Mohenjo-daro
civilization of the north Indian subcontinent, ancient
Mesopotamia, and
ancient Egypt. A mere mention would certify one or more of the
presently
shaky archeological chronologies, so experts on ancient
civilizations would
seem to have been powerfully motivated to scrutinize the scanty
surviving
records to find even a surviving mythological allusion. And yet,
so far they
have found nothing.
That is, at very least, curious. The absence of ancient record
may strike
those familiar with ancient acute fascination for celestial
events as
indicating something significantly lacking in either ancient
records or in
archeological discovery of them. What could be wrong?
A disturbing answer is that perhaps there may have been
observation. The
comet may have been seen. But before careful observations could
be recorded
- possibly awaiting final official decisions on portents, or
maybe simply
waiting a normal cyclical resolution to the heavenly phenomenon -
a
disastrous collision with Earth by a significant comet fragment
may have
taken place. And this caused sudden catastrophic global climate
changes.
Coincident with the previous appearance of Comet Hale-Bopp in
2213 BC,
something singularly dreadful seems to have happened on our small
fragile
blue planet. Not only does it appear that both the ancient
Mesopotamian and
Egyptian civilizations totally collapsed for a century or more,
there is
evidence of a sudden catastrophic-but-temporary climate change at
this time.
Is there a "bad weather" connection? Should we be
concerned with the
connection if there is one?
It is unlikely that the date 2213 BC could be wrong, although
over the past
four millennia it is conceivable that something gravitationally
significant
may have intersected with the orbit of comet Hale-Bopp and
altered it, thus
changing the date of its last appearance. But astronomically
speaking, 4200
years is fairly insignificant, and objects with that much serious
gravity
are pretty sparse in space. So the orbit-extrapolated date of
2213 BC would
seem reliable.
It would seem that Hale-Bopp made at least a notable if not
spectacular
appearance in the night sky four millennia ago, and the
astronomy-based
state religions of numerous centers of early agricultural
civilization would
have noted and recorded it either in official religious mythology
or in
observed fact, and somewhere at least fragment should have
survived. But
there appears to be no recorded mention.
Whatever happened that led to the remarkable omission would seem
to have
happened swiftly and planet-wide here on Earth. And while records
from the
ancient Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations mention no comet,
they do
contain suggestions of a catastrophe that may leave us with some
worrisome
implications for our near or distant future.
The ancient Egyptian chronology used by Egyptologist Aidan Dodson
in his
1995 book Monarchs of the Nile, based on latest research, has the
pharaoh
Pepi II (prenomen Neferkare) ruling Egypt between 2290 and 2196
BC when
Hale-Bopp is calculated to have last appeared in 2213 BC.
According to this
dating system, comet Hale-Bopp would have made its appearance in
the 77th
year of good king Pepi's reign.
But there is something puzzling about Pepi II. According to the
surviving
records, his reign lasted 94 years. Egyptologists have gone into
figurative
contortions to explain this. The prevailing view is that Pepi's
accession
came when he was only six, and that he lived to be a hundred.
But, as Dodson
mentions, some have suggested that Pepi's long reign should be
reduced to
sixty-four years. The length of the reign, then, is, at very
least, in
dispute. And given the difficulties in precise dating, 64 years
is close
enough to to the year 77 of Pepi II's reign, when the comet would
have
appeared, to raise questions about the causes of its end.
What is not in dispute is what followed the reign of Pepi II. The
next
pharaoh, Nemtyemsaf II, lasted a year, probably a fraction. Then,
in 2195 BC
(if we accept the ninety-four-year reign, or 30 years earlier,
2225 BC, or
maybe somewhere in between like 2213 BC?), came a period of such
political
and record-keeping chaos that not only is it called the First
Intermediate
Period, but the dynasties are uncertain and called
"VII" and "VIII," and
even the next two dynasties following the First Intermediate are
conspicuously puzzled-out and called "Dynasties IX/X"
and "Dynasty XIa." The
period of confusion between the present disputes for the end Pepi
II's reign
and the end of Dynasty XIa thus goes from just prior to or just
after 2200
BC to 2066 BC, about a century to a century and a half.
Something happened at about the time the comet appeared that
threw Egypt
into chaos for a number of generations, several lifetimes, long
enough for
word-of-mouth memory to forget. It appears to have occurred
suddenly, caused
chaos, and by the time chaos ended generations later, the
initiating series
of events were no longer part of living memory.
Corroboration comes from Mesopotamia. Something brought down the
Akkadian
civilization.
Around 2200 BC - give or take at least a decade in the
approximate dating
and close enough to the comet's last appearance to raise
questions -
civilization collapsed. Reference to the initial collapse is
contained in
"The Curse of Naram-Sin," a clay-tablet docu-drama
about transgression and
heavenly punishment of the last king of Akkad, Naram-Sin. In it,
hill people
known as the Guti, probably ancestors of the modern Kurds (and
possibly the
same word if one pronounces "Guti" with a combination
of a Boston accent, a
soft "G" and a hard "t" to make it
"Kurdi") overrun Akkad amid allusions to
a sudden climate change. Subsequently people we call the
Amorites, whom the
Sumerian script calls the MARTU (who spoke a language closer to
Hebrew than
Akkadian), appeared from the west and overran what would appear
to be a
futile attempt to restore the Akkadian Empire from the ancient
city of Ur.
This was followed - in Mesopotamia, as would appear to have
simultaneously
occurred in Egypt - by a period of chaos lasting a century and a
half to two
centuries.
Two independent areas of ancient civilization collapsed at about
the time
comet Hale-Bopp last appeared. That should be troubling. The
sudden
appearance of a strange celestial object might cause temporary
panic in the
populations of these two ancient empires. Indeed we see the same
phenomenon
in the cult-suicide of Applewhite and his followers even in our
enlightened
scientific age. But temporary panic would hardly seem sufficient
to have
brought about the kind of serious political and economic collapse
that
lasted over a century in both ancient areas of civilization.
A group of Yale University archaeologists and scientists
investigating the
period at an archeological site in Mesopotamia called Tell Leilan
has
uncovered something that in this context may summon a scary
scenario. In an
article in Science, 20 August 1993 (page 995) titled "The
Genesis and
Collapse of Third Millennium North Mesopotamian
Civilization," Weiss, et al,
found, if I may quote a bit of the abstract: "At 2200 B.C.,
a marked
increase in aridity and wind circulation, subsequent to a
volcanic eruption,
induced a considerable degradation of land-use conditions. After
four
centuries of urban life, this abrupt climate change evidently
caused the
abandonment of Tel Leilan."
Not only did two great ancient civilizations suddenly collapse
and enter
into chaos for over a century - sinisterly coincident with the
previous
appearance of comet Hale-Bopp - a cataclysmic event, followed by
a serious
sudden temporary climate change, appears to have taken place at
the onset of
the collapse.
Did some large part of comet Hale-Bopp collide with our delicate
small blue
planet in 2213 BC? Clear in our present memory are those
remarkable
Earth-based and space telescope photographs of Comet
Shoemaker-Levy, broken
up into a string of giant objects, serially colliding with the
giant planet
Jupiter between July 16 and July 22, 1994.
Is it possible that the comet Hale-Bopp we saw for a month in the
spring of
1997 is only a part of a once larger comet that appeared in 2213
BC? Might
some of the rest of that comet now be part of the matter of our
planet Earth
after having collided with it in 2213 BC?
What effect would a high-speed impact of a several-mile-diameter
giant
snowball have with our planet's landmass, in, say far away North
America,
Siberia, or Australia - in other words far enough from Egypt and
Mesopotamia
not to have been recorded as the cause of devastating effects? It
seems
conceivable that the impact could throw up debris similar to that
of a
volcanic eruption, or alternatively, it would seem that the
resultant giant
vapor cloud could bring about, first, a solar-energy occlusion,
and then a
resulting sudden mini-ice-age, and then planetary water-weight
shift would
precipitate increases in volcanic activity adding magnitude to
the temporary
climate change.
The coincidence of (1) the comet Hale-Bopp's last appearance in
2213 BC, (2)
the total collapse of two significant ancient civilizations for
over a
century beginning around 2200 BC, and (3) good evidence of a
sudden
climate-changing catastrophe around 2200 BC seems too much for
thoughtful
folks to ignore. Something sudden and terrible, associated with
the comet
Hale-Bopp, would appear to have happened.
Did our ancient ancestors get bopped by a fragment of Hale-Bopp?
If so,
where did it hit? And: might there be another fragment following
Hale-Bopp
out there that could intersect with our planet's orbit? Again?
© 2001 About.com, Inc.
============
(2) MISSING CARBON-2 MOLECULE HOLDS CLUES TO COMET'S ORIGIN
From Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>
Office of Public Affairs
University of Texas-Austin
P O Box Z
Austin, Texas 78713-7509
(512) 471-3151
FAX (512) 471-5812
Contact:
Rebecca Johnson or Mary Lenz
Office of Public Affairs
(512) 475-6763
Missing carbon-2 molecule holds clues to comet's origin
AUSTIN, Texas -- Astronomers seeking to chart the solar system's
evolution
reaped a windfall of information when a comet disintegrated just
as it made
its closest approach to the sun and they were able to observe the
comet's
contents and, possibly, its origin.
Their work will be published Friday (May 18) in the journal
Science -- a
special issue devoted to studies of the comet, called C/1999 S4
(LINEAR),
that disintegrated last July.
Dr. Tony L. Farnham, a planetary scientist at The University of
Texas at
Austin, and his colleagues discovered a deficiency in the
molecule carbon-2
in Comet C/1999 S4 (LINEAR). Farnham, lead author of the paper,
is the
Harlan J. Smith Planetary Post-doctoral Researcher in the UT
Austin
department of astronomy. (LINEAR refers to the Lincoln Near Earth
Asteroid
Research project funded by the U.S. Air Force to study near earth
objects.)
Co-authors include Dr. David G. Schleicher and Dr. Laura M.
Woodney of
Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Ariz.; Peter V. Birch of Perth
Observatory
in Western Australia; Clara A. Eberhardy of the University of
Washington in
Seattle; and Lorenza Levy of Northern Arizona University in
Flagstaff.
"We usually get a look at the surface of a comet, but this
time we got to
look inside," Farnham said. The group observed the comet
both before and
after it broke up, using telescopes at UT Austin's McDonald
Observatory,
Lowell Observatory and Perth Observatory.
Comets are sometimes referred to as 'dirty snowballs,' because
they are made
up of dust and rock held together by ice. When they venture close
to the
sun, the ice vaporizes and elements inside are released.
The carbon-2 deficiency discovered by Farnham and his colleagues
indicates
that the comet formed near Neptune, probably billions of years
ago. Most
comets were formed during the solar system's earliest years in
two regions:
near Jupiter and Saturn, and farther out, near Neptune.
They didn't stay in those regions, however, because the force of
gravity of
those giant planets catapulted the comets away, and created two
comet
habitats: the Oort Cloud (a halo of Jupiter-origin comets
enveloping the
solar system) and the Kuiper Belt (a belt of Neptune-origin
comets orbiting
in the plane of the solar system along with the planets, beyond
Neptune's
orbit).
Different lines of evidence may indicate another history for
C/1999 S4
(LINEAR). Other researchers found the comet to be lacking in
other
carbon-chain molecules, pointing to a Jupiter-region origin,
Farnham said.
He said the discrepancy "may be telling us that it has a
surface material
different from what's inside. It's possible that the comet formed
near the
Jupiter region, and other materials formed on the surface as it
migrated
out," into the outer solar system. But Farnham cautioned
that there is no
proof of this.
Understanding the origin of comets is important because they
carry key
information about the history of the solar system that cannot be
derived
from studying planets. Comets have changed very little since the
solar
system formed. They are relics of an earlier time. Geological
processes
(like volcanic eruptions and the movements of glaciers) have
rewritten the
surfaces of most of the planets since their formation.
"Comets have been in storage, especially dynamically new
comets, like this
one," Farnham explained. He said comets remain in the cold
realms of the
Oort Cloud and Kuiper Belt until some large body like a planet or
a passing
star gives them a gravitational kick into the inner solar system.
A
'dynamically new' comet is one that has never been in the inner
regions of
the solar system before.
Farnham also calculated a lower limit for the radius of the
comet's nucleus
before break-up: about 0.4 kilometers. In addition, he observed
an
'outburst' from the comet, at the same time other researchers
using the
Hubble Space Telescope photographed a piece of the comet breaking
away.
Comet C/1999 S4 (LINEAR) was not visible to the naked eye.
For more information, contact Dr. Tony L. Farhnam at (512)
471-1483, or via
e-mail at farnham@astro.as.utexas.edu
or see:
http://www.ll.mit.edu/LINEAR
============
(3) COPYCAT COMET CRACKS INTO THREE PIECES, MAYBE MORE
From Space.com, 21 May 2001
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/comet_breakup_010521.html
By Robert Roy Britt
Senior Science Writer
If copyright laws applied to cosmic acts, then Comet 2001 A2
would be in
court right now.
First it broke into two pieces earlier this spring just after a
rapid
brightening session. Now one of those two chunks has split apart
and
researchers say there may be many smaller pieces flying through
space.
If the scenario sounds familiar, it's because this isn't the
first comet to
break apart in recent months. The disintegration act comes less
than a year
after another comet, called 1999 S4, broke into several large
pieces and
countless smaller ones, all in plain view of numerous telescopes.
That event
led to a bevy of revealing scientific papers on comet formation
that were
released just last Thursday.
Both of these comets have been popularly called
"LINEAR," named after the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Lincoln Near Earth
Asteroid Research
telescope, which was used to discover them.
The most recent LINEAR comet, 2001 A2, was discovered just this
year on Jan.
3 and presumed initially to be intact. It brightened suddenly and
unexpectedly back in March and April. As comets approach the Sun,
their
nucleus of gas and dust burns off and forms a halo, or coma, that
glows with
reflected sunlight.
Then on April 30th, researchers at the University of Arizona's
Lunar and
Planetary Laboratory photographed the comet after its nucleus had
broken
into two pieces. When a comet breaks apart, more fresh material
is exposed,
which likely contributed to the sudden brightening.
The latest split
Now the comet is about 62 million miles (100 million kilometers)
from Earth,
but it is no longer visible from the Northern Hemisphere. On May
14,
scientists using a European Southern Observatory telescope in
Chile noticed
that one of the comet's two fragments appeared to be elongated.
On May 16, last Wednesday, it became clear that the comet had
split into
three pieces. A colorful image of the latest breakup was released
Friday.
Hermann Boehnhardt of the European Southern Observatory works on
the team
that spotted the three large chunks. He told SPACE.com that the
orbit of
2001 A2 is so different from 1999 S4 that the two comets are not
likely
close relatives in terms of where they were created in the disk
of gas and
dust that swirled around our Sun when it was born.
Depending on what the comet does in coming months, Boehnhardt
said,
additional observations might allow researchers to figure out
where it
formed and why it broke apart.
Drifting apart
When Boehnhardt and his colleagues first spotted the comet in
three pieces,
roughly 310 miles (500 kilometers) separated the two
freshly-split chunks.
The distance between this pair and the other piece was about
3,700 miles
(6,000 kilometers) on May 14 and increased by about 620 miles
(1,000
kilometers) within two days.
No one can yet say how big the pieces are or how large the
comet's nucleus
was before it broke apart.
The comet moves in an exceedingly elongated orbit around the Sun
and it is
making perhaps its first return trip to the inner solar system
after a long
hiatus in the Oort Cloud, a halo of comets that surrounds the
solar system.
If it is the comet's first pass, that means it has not been in
the main part
of the solar system since back when it formed, likely about 4.6
billion
years ago when the rest of the solar system developed. Its
contents would be
pristine, and researchers will be interested to study it and see
if it adds
to the long list of discoveries made by observing the other
LINEAR comet
that broke apart last summer.
Where it is, where it's going
Comet 2001 A2 can now be seen with the unaided eye by observers
in the
Southern Hemisphere as a faint object in the southern
constellation of Lepus
(The Hare).
It will pass through its perihelion -- the point in its orbit
nearest to the
Sun -- on May 25, at a distance of about 72 million miles (116
million
kilometers). Then it will reappear in Northern Hemisphere skies
at the end
of June after it swings under the Sun. By then, it might be
visible to the
naked eye, though that is not certain and its recent further
disintegration
clouds that possibility.
Hal Weaver, a Johns Hopkins University researcher involved in the
recent
studies of Comet 1999 S4 that broke up last summer, said it's
possible the
same fate might await 2001 A2.
"We'll have to keep watching over the next several
months," Weaver said.
Meanwhile, he's working on a French-led team making plans to
observe 2001 A2
with the Hubble Space Telescope, likely in July.
Copyright 2001, Space.com
===========
(4) COMET'S DEMISE REVERSES 'DIRTY SNOWBALL' THEORY
From Los Angeles Times, 21 May 2001
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/science/20010521/t000042583.html
From Times Staff
Astronomers watching the "under-performing" Comet
Linear last July were
astounded when it unexpectedly burst apart, offering them a
direct view of
its internal structure in its disintegrating heart. Icy comets
are usually
described as "dirty snowballs." Linear was comprised of
rocky matter with
only a little ice, making it more of a "snowy
dirtball."
Its fragments, scientists reported in the May 18 issue of the
journal
Science, appear to be the same material that makes up planets.
The comet was
relatively free of carbon-rich compounds observed in the ice of
other
comets, casting some doubt on the theory that comets delivered
the precursor
molecules necessary for life on Earth.
Copyright 2001, Los Angeles Times
==========
(5) WHAT WE LEARNED FROM THE LAST YEAR'S COMET LINEAR
From John Wagoner <stargate@astromax.com>
SKY & TELESCOPE'S NEWS BULLETIN - MAY 18, 2001
For images and Web links for these items, visit http://www.skypub.com
Last June, amateur and professional astronomers alike focused
their
telescopes on what was thought to be a mediocre comet as best.
Discovered by
the Lincoln Near Earth Asteroid Search, Comet LINEAR (C/1999 S4)
soon became
a cosmic curiosity. In Hubble Space Telescope observations taken
in July,
the comet appeared to have erupted, with a large fragment having
clearly
broken off the nucleus. In the month that followed, the comet
crumbled apart
completely, faded from view, and in the process, exposed its
interior to
science.
In a series of papers published in today's Science, astronomers
reveal what
they have learned thus far from the deceased comet. In addition
its chemical
composition and probable origin, (see following story)
astronomers now think
they may understand why the comet came apart in the first place.
Originally
they assumed that Comet LINEAR's breakup was due to massive
outgassing --
perhaps the result of an outburst of carbon monoxide (CO), the
most probable
suspect. However spectroscopic analysis found the comet to be
highly
depleted of CO, thus making a pressure build-up of gas within the
nucleus an
unlikely cause.
Instead, Hal Weaver (Johns Hopkins University), author on three
of the
Science papers, believes the comet was most likely rotating
quickly on its
approach to the Sun. If the rotation pole was pointed toward the
Sun, says
Weaver, "there would be more efficient heat transfer
throughout the comet."
But he adds that it isn't clear the comet was rotating fast
enough to break
apart. The critical rotation speed depends largely on the initial
size of
the comet's nucleus, a quantity
yet to be determined.
Another interesting facet of Comet LINEAR is what wasn't seen.
The assumed
mass of the comet before it crumbled is 100 times larger than the
mass found
afterward. Some of this is to be expected. Larger blocks are
directly
detectable, as are the smallest of particles, which refract light
much the
same way a thick fog would. But just as a thick fog easily hides
all but the
largest of objects from view, so too did LINEAR's dust cloud.
"Watching the unraveling of the comet allows us to look in
reverse at its
formation," says Weaver. Thus determining the size of the
intermediate
fragments directly relates to the size of cometary nuclei in
general. An
abundance of intermediate-size building blocks imply that, on the
whole,
cometary nuclei may be smaller than previously thought.
Comet breakups are far from unusual. For example, another LINEAR
discovery,
C/2001 A2 -- currently visible in Southern Hemisphere skies --
recently
broke in half on its approach to the Sun. On May 16th, the
8.2-meter Yepun
reflector of the Very Large Telescope took an image showing that
a third
piece has broken off. LINEAR C/2001 A2 reaches its closest point
to the Sun
on May 24th. The comet also continues to brighten. Observers
report that it
is a naked-eye 5th magnitude, where the comet is about 20 deg.
above the
west-southwest horizon after evening twilight. It will not be
visible from
the Northern Hemisphere until late June. Here are coordinates for
Comet
LINEAR C/2001 A2 at 0 hours Universal Time for the coming week:
R.A. Dec.
May 19 5h 35m -23.4 deg.
May 21 5 31 -24.1
May 23 5 27 -24.8
May 25 5 21 -25.5
A COMET'S LINEAR-AGE
Even before its slow-motion disintegration last year, Comet
LINEAR (C/1999
S4) was the crosshairs of many telescopes. Its brightness allowed
planetary
scientists to conduct spectroscopic studies that would be
impossible on
dimmer passers-by. Curiously, Comet LINEAR proved to be unlike
other bright
comets, in that it contained relatively little carbon monoxide
(CO) relative
to its water content.
Frozen CO vaporizes even at very cold temperatures, so when seen
abundantly
in the comas of Halley, Hale-Bopp, and Hyakutake, astronomers
concluded that
these iceballs formed very cold, in the vicinity of Uranus or
Neptune,
before being flung out into the distant cometary reservoir known
as the Oort
Cloud. This trio of comets also exhibited a high ratio of
deuterium to
hydrogen, typical of that found in interstellar clouds of gas.
Because the
comets' D-to-H ratio was at least double that found here on
Earth, cosmic
chemists began to think that only a fraction of our planet's
water could
have been delivered by comets.
However, Comet LINEAR's low CO value implies that it formed
somewhat closer
to the Sun's warmth, perhaps near Jupiter, before taking up
residence in the
Oort Cloud. As Michael C. Mumma (NASA/Goddard) and his colleagues
explain in
today's issue of Science, such comets should have D:H ratios much
closer to
that of seawater, which could mean that incoming comets delivered
the bulk
of Earth's water after all. "The idea that comets seeded
life on Earth with
water and essential molecular building blocks is hotly
debated," Mumma
notes, "and for the first time, we have seen a comet with
the right
composition to do the job." But his team will have to wait
for another
bright comet to test their hypothesis further, because Comet
LINEAR's D:H
ratio could not be determined.
Of course, comets weren't the only small bodies that formed near
Jupiter.
Asteroids did too, and the most distant ones contain up to 20
percent water.
In 1997, Harold Levison (Southwest Research Institute) and Martin
Duncan
(Queen's University) estimated that roughly 8 percent of all the
objects
initially present in the outer asteroid belt (3.3. to 5.0
astronomical units
from the Sun) were ejected by Jupiter into the Oort Cloud. Over
time, some
of these must boomerang their way back to the inner solar system.
Even if
LINEAR wasn't one of them, it's definitely caused a stir among
planetary
scientists.
[...]
Copyright 2001 Sky Publishing Corporation. S&T's Weekly News
Bulletin and
Sky at a Glance stargazing calendar are provided as a service to
the
astronomical community by the editors of SKY & TELESCOPE
magazine.
Widespread electronic distribution is encouraged as long as these
paragraphs are included. But the text of the bulletin and
calendar may not
be published in any other form without permission from Sky
Publishing
(contact permissions@skypub.com
or phone 617-864-7360). Updates of
astronomical news, including active links to related Internet
resources, are
available via SKY & TELESCOPE's site on the World Wide Web at
http://www.skypub.com/.
===========
FLYBYS: ASTEROIDS 2000 XG47 & 2001 GQ2
From Spaceweather.com, 26 January 2001
Two near-Earth asteroids are passing by our planet on April 27th:
2000 XG47
and 2001 GQ2. Amateur astronomers with 8 inch or better
telescopes and CCD
cameras can spot the space rocks as they brighten to ~13th
magnitude in the
days ahead. 2000 XG47 (pictured above) is a ~1.5 km object that
comes no
closer to Earth than 0.106 AU. 2001 GQ2 is much smaller (only
~300m across)
but it's just as bright as its larger cousin because 2001 GQ2 is
nearer to
us -- only 0.02 AU (about 8 lunar distances) from our
planet on Friday.
==========
(6) WILD WIDE UNIVERSE
From The Hindu, 21 May 2001
http://www.indiaserver.com/thehindu/2001/05/21/stories/0421403r.htm
OUTER SPACE is as violent as the earth! Accidents and collisions
are
happening all the time by the comets, meteors, and other space
objects. And,
when these collide with our planet, they could be devastating.
For hundreds of years, man has feared attacks from beings of
other planets
and the prospect of some gigantic object crashing into our
atmosphere
endangering life. The dinosaurs, which ruled the planet, are said
to have
vapourised into thin air after a giant meteorite or a comet hit
the earth.
The Chicxulab crater in Mexico, Lonar lake in Maharashtra, the
fireworks in
Siberia in 1908 known as the Tunguska event, meteorite fall in
Piplian
Kalan, a village in Rajasthan, are all examples of the objects
from the
limitless universe falling into the earth.
These matters and more were quite exhilaratingly presented in the
Birla
Planetarium's new sky show - `The Violent Universe', which has
been
inaugurated on Saturday with the Union Minister of State for
Home, Ch.
Vidyasagar Rao, attending.
With a depiction of the city's night sky, the viewers are
transported to the
outerspace beyond the solar system. The planets and the asteroid
belt
between Mars and Jupiter from where huge chunks of rocks
sometimes hurtle
towards the earth are shown. The `Oort cloud' beyond the orbit of
Pluto from
where the comets originate which, too, at times crash into our
planet is
projected dramatically.
As the planetarium Director, Dr. B.G. Sidharth, explains, the
universe is a
strange place as the collisions and explosions that destroy and
kill can
also create and give birth to new celestial objects and perhaps,
even life!
Astronomers also believe the comets collision with earth to be
responsible
for the origin of life.
But, what happens when a giant rock debris comes in direct
conflict with
earth? Can we ward off the danger with our nuclear weapons as
shown in
Hollywood flicks? A round-the-clock monitoring service is on in
the United
States to look for signals from outer space and also to watch out
for such
probable catastrophic collisions.
Certainly, a new treat for the star gazers at the planetarium.
By V. Geetanath
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu & indiaserver.com, Inc.
==============
(7) COMET C/1999 S4 (LINEAR)
From Comets & Meteor Showers
http://comets.amsmeteors.org/comets/lcomets/1999s4.html
Discovery
This is another comet found by the automatic minor planet search
program
LINEAR in New Mexico. It was found on CCD images obtained between
1999
September 27.40 and September 27.45 and was reported as an
unusual moving
object. The nuclear magnitude was given as 17.3-17.6. LINEAR
obtained
additional images on September 28 and October 1. On October 1.40
and 1.43,
D. T. Durig (Cordell-Lorenz Observatory, Sewanee, Tennessee)
obtained images
of the comet with a 0.3-m Schmidt-Cassegrain and a CCD. He noted
a total
magnitude of 16.3 on the second image, as well as a coma 10
arcsec across
and a tail extending 20-25 arcsec toward PA 200°-220°. The
cometary nature
was confirmed on October 1.89, when J. Ticha and M. Tichy (Klet
Observatory)
imaged the comet with a 0.57-m reflector and a CCD. They
determined the
total magnitude as 16.2 and noted a coma 8 arcsec across and a
tail
extending more than 10 arcsec toward PA 245°.
Historical Highlights
The first published orbit came from Brian G. Marsden
(Harvard-Smithsonian
Center for Astrophysics) on October 1. His parabolic solution,
based on
observations collected over five days, indicated a perihelion
date of 2000
July 18 and a perihelion distance of 0.72 AU. He suggested
"this comet might
become a naked-eye object next July." Marsden revised the
comet's orbit on
October 6, using positions collected over eight days. The new
perihelion
date was 2000 July 24.2 and a perihelion distance of 0.754 AU.
His ephemeris
indicated the comet's maximum brightness could reach magnitude 4.
The comet slowly brightened during the months immediately
following
discovery. It was slightly fainter than magnitude 14 during
November and was
brighter than 14 as 2000 began. The total magnitude had reached
13.5 during
the first week of March, and the comet was lost in the sun's
glare after
March 22.
The comet was recovered in the morning sky on May 4, by K. Kadota
(Ageo,
Japan) at a magnitude of about 13. Observations by other
observers began
around mid-May after the comet had gained more altitude in the
morning sky
and had become brighter than magnitude 12. By the beginning of
June most
observers were reporting a brightness slightly fainter than
magnitude 10,
with a moderately condensed coma about 3 arcmin across. Visual
observations
of the tail became fairly common in larger amateur telescopes
after
mid-June, with the length typically estimated as 4-5 arcmin. As
June came to
a close, most observers found the comet slightly brighter than
magnitude
8.5. The coma was then about 5-6 arcmin across and the tail about
10 arcmin
long.
During June, revised predictions of the maximum brightness of
this comet
indicated a maximum magnitude of 4 to 6 would be attained around
July 22 or
23. Although an apparent change in the rate of brightening
occurred on June
22, which indicated the comet was heading for the magnitude 6
prediction, an
minor outburst around July 5 to 6 was indicated by visual
observers and
fathered hopes that the comet might still reach magnitude 4 or 5.
This
brightening only lasted a few days, however, and by mid-July most
observers
were giving in to the possibility that this comet would not
become brighter
than magnitude 6. With respect to the brightening in early July,
it is
interesting that on July 28, the Space Telescope Science
Institute issued
press release giving details of observations made by the Hubble
Space
Telescope on July 5, 6, and 7. The images indicate a brief
outburst on the
6th and the appearance of a fragment moving toward the tail from
the nucleus
on the 7th. Complete details and images can be found at the
Hubble Space
Telescope web site.
The comet continued a slow brightening as July progressed. By
July 21, the
general consensus was that the comet's brightness was between
magnitude 6.6
and 6.8, with a coma 5 to 6 arcmin across and a dust tail 30 to
60 arcmin
long. But something happened late on the 21st and by July 22,
observers were
commonly reporting the magnitude as around 6 and, although the
coma diameter
and dust tail had not changed, there was a bright, straight, long
gas tail.
My personal observations on July 22.16 revealed a brighter comet
than I had
seen a couple of days earlier, a a unmistakable, straight gas
tail extending
at least 1 degree. This is exactly why people like me observe
comets. Their
potential unpredictability makes them very interesting.
So, on July 23 I asked the question "what will happen
next?" and noted "The
gas tail seen on the 21st and 22nd was certainly short-lived and
indicates
something sudden and violent occurred to the nucleus. It may only
prove to
have been a new pocket of gas that was released, but observers
should be on
the lookout for something more within the coma during the next
few days and
weeks." Well, the comet has indeed undergone changes that
became apparent
shortly before July ended. The comet's nuclear region became
noticeably more
diffuse and elongated beginning on July 25, and the comet began
fading at a
rate much greater than had been predicted. My final observation
was made
with my 33.3-cm reflector on August 2 and revealed a slightly
elongated
nebulosity with virtually no condensation. My estimate of the
comet's
brightness was 9, which was over 2 magnitudes fainter than
expected.
The Hubble Space Telescope was used to observe the comet on
August 5. What
it found was more than a dozen tiny comets enveloped by a cloud
of dust in
the area where comet LINEAR was supposed to be. The image below
is only a
small section of the photo. The large scale images and complete
story are on
the Hubble web site. Interestingly, the images were obtained at
about the
same time as another, wider field image was obtained with the
2.2-meter
telescope at the Mauna Kea observatory complex.
In a display of how good ground-based observations can be, the
European
Southern Observatory released an image obtained at Paranal
(Chile) with the
8.2-m Very Large Telescope ANTU unit on the evening of August 6.
A portion
of the image is shown below. The complete image and press release
is located
on the VLT web site.
============================
* LETTERS TO THE MODERATOR *
============================
(8) PYRAMIDS IN THE SKY
From Duncan Steel <D.I.Steel@salford.ac.uk>
Dear Benny,
I note with interest various recent postings that have involved
the
(Egyptian) pyramids and their possible connections with solar
system
phenomena (as opposed to earlier suggestions made over recent
decades of
alignments with more distant celestial objects: stars and so on).
Matt Genge
discussed the possible pyramidal shape of meteorites.
Let me turn attention to another solar system phenomenon. If one
were to
look up "zodiacal light" in a selection of astronomy
dictionaries, many
entries will be found to begin by saying that this is the
"pyramid-shaped
column of light centered on the ecliptic and seen in the east
soon before
sunrise or in the west soon after sunset" - or some such
statement. (This
was pointed out to me by Howard Jones some years ago.) This
phenomenon is
caused by interplanetary dust, concentrated about the ecliptic,
which
scatters sunlight. The major contributor is dust in the 10-100
micron size
range. Such dust is produced/liberated by comets, and there is
also a
fraction resulting from inter-asteroid collisions.
Although people living in temperate latitudes (especially cities
due to the
artificial lights) may not be familiar with the zodiacal light,
those living
nearer the tropics will know it well. The pyramid shapes near the
horizon
are bright due to the dust (which has a spatial density
increasing towards
lesser heliocentric distances) causing efficient forward-scatter
of
sunlight. In a particularly dark location someone with excellent
eyes may be
able to see the zodiacal band: a thin band of light following the
ecliptic
across the night sky. This brightens as the solar opposition
point is
reached, due to the increased efficiency of direct backscatter
(similarly
the full moon is typically nine times as bright as the Moon at
first or last
quarter, not merely twice as bright). This dust-scattered light
near
opposition is called the 'gegenschein' (counter glow). I believe
that I
would be correct to say that fully 40% of the total light in the
moonless
sky is due to scatter by interplanetary dust.
That, though, is the situation at present. Although one could
suggest that
if the pharoahic Egyptians were mimicking something celestial
with their
pyramids, the present zodiacal light is impressive enough.
However, there is
no compelling reason to suppose that what they saw 4,800 years
ago is the
same as what we see now. The lifetimes of interplanetary dust
grains are
measured only on timescales of 10^3-10^4 years on various
dynamical grounds,
plus collisional lifetime calculations, and ip dust collected in
the
stratosphere display cosmic ray track ages indicative of this
short time
scale. A recent paper by Bill Napier that was mentioned in CCNet
has shown
how the interplanetary dust population may be expected to display
radical
departures from any long-term (10^5-10^6 year) average.
The pyramidal zodiacal light might therefore have been much
brighter in the
past. Similarly the zodiacal band would have been much brighter.
In the past
astronomers/archaeologists have connected the ancient Egyptian
allusions to
a "river in the sky" (a celestial analogue of the Nile)
with the broad sweep
of the Milky Way. I would suggest that perhaps a much more
prominent
zodiacal band is what they were talking about, especially if it
were
changing its characteristics and brightness.
If a very bright and active comet were responsible for a major
but temporary
dust population boost, as recently modelled by Napier (and
previously
discussed in various publications by him and the usual suspects:
Asher,
Bailey, Clube, Steel), then an immediate product through which
much of the
eventual small dust would stem is a massive meteoroid stream.
(Here
"meteoroid" denotes a particle larger than 100 microns
and thus not "dust";
that size is the approximate micrometeorite limit, with smaller
particles
slowing down in the atmosphere without ablating, whereas larger
ones produce
"meteors" and so sublimate away to virtually nothing.)
That meteoroid
stream, if it had a perihelion distance of less than 1 AU, would
intersect
the Earth at least once per year in various multi-century
episodes,
connected with its precession under secular perturbations. When
an
intersection occurs, phenomenal meteor showers/storms would
occur. The
meteor trains during such storms produce another celetial effect
like a
pyramid, within which the viewer is enclosed; the shower radiant
is the apex
of the pyramid.
A final couple note. Pyramids of various designs are found
elsewhere, not
just in Egypt. Of course they are of different ages, but it might
be noted
that in general they are located within the tropics. The tropics
are the
places where the zodiacal light is most obvious, and also where
it spends
more of the year appearing as a vertical pyramid (as opposed to
the slope of
the ecliptic on the horizon for most of the year at higher
latitudes).
Just a few things to chew on.
Duncan Steel
===========
(9) SHAPE OF PYRAMIDS
From Rolf Sinclair <rolf@santafe.edu>
Hi Benny --
Regarding the shape of pyramids (CCNet 69/2001 - 18 May 2001):
Kurt
Mendelssohn, in "The Riddle of the Pyramids" (1974),
made a simple
suggestion, that the shape of the pyramids was inspired by a
common pattern
of rays of sunlight, angling down to the left and right when the
sun itself
was obscured by a cloud. He also argued that this shape was
developed by
trial and error, the
process involving one pyramid that collapsed while partly built.
His book
developed the important role that the social organization
necessary for the
pyramid construction enterprise would have played in the
development of the
Egyptian state, and through this explained a number of features
of the
pyramids.
Rolf
==========
(10) IMPACTS & HUMAN EVOLUTION
From Worth Crouch <doagain@jps.net>
Dear Dr. Peiser:
I have been reading considerable criticism in the CCNet about
your
forthcoming collaborative paper IMPACTS & HUMAN EVOLUTION.
Although some of
the criticism has merit I think much of it is trivial, because it
doesn't
address the essence of the arguments found in your paper.
As I understand IMPACTS & HUMAN EVOLUTION there is an attempt
to point out
that during the last five million years of human evolution our
planet has
been bombarded by cosmic (asteroid/comet) collisions. The
collisions were of
various numbers, at various places, and through a distribution of
various
magnitudes. There is an attempt to quantify the numbers, places,
and
magnitudes and an analysis of their potential consequence on
human evolution
is presented. Furthermore, the numbers, places, and magnitudes of
the
collisions written about are not inconsequential; therefore some
consequence
on human evolution should be easily understood without much
argument, some
arguable, and some never to be known. A few possible consequences
are:
* Due to the dispersion of humanoids our ancestors survived
direct
impacts.
* Various humanoids possibly became extinct, because they failed
to
adapt as well as our ancestors to environmental conditions
following
cosmic impacts.
* Volcanism, earthquakes, and fires following impacts encouraged
our
ancestors to increase their adventure onto the plains or at least
to the
periphery of the woodlands to avoid forest fires and competition
for
diminishing forest resources.
* Thus, bipedal mobility would be encouraged along with upright
posture. Moreover, our ancestors would have an advantage, because
their
hands would become increasingly free to make better tools than
other
humanoids; consequently the evolution of the human thumb could
take place.
* Furthermore, our ancestors would have had an advantage if
sunlight
were reduced due to dust in the upper atmosphere resulting from
cosmic impacts. Those that could better make fire, fashion
garments,
and develop warmer places to live would have a better chance to
survive
and reproduce.
* During times, which resulted from cosmic impacts, when stress
was
placed on humanoids to provide food, our ancestors had an
advantage. Those
that had language would be more fit to hunt, garden, and gather
food
because they could work in specialty teams better than those
without
language communication.
Some of this means that intelligence was a survival strategy that
our
ancestors incorporated through evolution to perpetuate themselves
and
advance the species through stressful times.
I suppose I could go on for quite a while explaining how some
stress, but
not too mush, could advance the evolutionary process of our
ancestors, but
this is well understood by most biologists, geologists, and
paleontologists.
The simple point of IMPACTS & HUMAN EVOLUTION is that cosmic
impacts
provided environmental stress from outer space that could advance
human
evolution and probably speed it up a bit. I don't think any good
scientists
would discount the importance of IMPACTS & HUMAN EVOLUTION if
in fact the
impacts altered the environment so that increasing stress was
placed on our
evolving ancestors; thus causing them to adapt and advance so our
species
could evolve. Moreover, after examining the devastation of the
small 1908
cosmic impact in Siberia it would be very hard to believe the
impacts
described in IMPACTS & HUMAN EVOLUTION would not stress the
nearby humanoid
populations into even more adaptations, or extinctions, than I
have
described.
Worth F. Crouch
(Talako)
Choctaw Society of Astrobiologists
=============
* ABSTRACTS *
=============
(11) MORE OBSERVATIONS OF SHOEMAKER-LEVY 9 IMPACT
de Pater I, Brecht SH: SL9 impacts: VLA high-resolution
observations at
lambda=20 cm
ICARUS 151 (1): 1-24 MAY 2001
We present high resolution (0.3 R-J) VLA observations of Jupiter
at a
wavelength of 20 cm which were taken during and after the impacts
of Comet
D/Shoemaker-Levy 9. The observations are presented both as a
function of
central meridian longitude lambda (cml) and, after applying
tomographic
techniques, as a function of jovicentric longitude lambda (III)
Following an
impact all radiation peaks (both the main and high latitude
emission peaks)
usually shift inward, toward the planet, and brighten up; the
first impact,
however, triggered a decrease rather than an increase in the
intensity of
the radiation peaks. Although the high latitude regions always
brighten,
they do not brighten up as much as the main radiation peaks
during the first
few days of the impacts, whereas they brighten up significantly
more than
the main radiation peaks later in the impact week. The high
latitude
regions, in particular in the southern hemisphere, move slightly
closer to
the magnetic equator. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
Addresses:
de Pater I, Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Astron, 601 Campbell Hall,
Berkeley,
CA 94720 USA
Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Astron, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
Bay Area Res Corp, Orinda, CA 94563 USA
Copyright © 2001 Institute for Scientific Information
============
(12) MODIFICATION OF THE JOVIAN RADIATION BELT BY SHOEMAKER-LEVY
9
Brecht SH, de Pater I, Larson DJ, Pesses ME: Modification of the
Jovian
radiation belts by Shoemaker-Levy 9: An explanation of the data
ICARUS 151 (1): 25-38 MAY 2001
The SL9 impacts provided a unique data set with which to examine
some
surprising physical mechanisms at work. This paper examines some
of the data
in light of the collisionless shock acceleration paradigm, called
diffusive
shock acceleration. The research finds that both the shock
acceleration
mechanism and an enhanced diffusion mechanism are required to
explain the
data. Direct numerical simulations and analytic models are used
to compare
these mechanisms with the data collected. The results are
consistent with
the data. In addition further analysis of these SL9 VLA data
strongly
suggests that for periods of days the relativistic radiation
belts drift in
a direction opposite to that predicted by normal drift theory.
(C) 2001
Academic Press.
Addresses:
Brecht SH, Bay Area Res Corp, POB 366, Orinda, CA 94563 USA
Bay Area Res Corp, Orinda, CA 94563 USA
Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
Sci Applicat Int Corp, Mclean, VA 22102 USA
Copyright © 2001 Institute for Scientific Information
============
(13) THE SHOEMAKER-LEVY 9 IMPACT & ENHANCED RADIAL DIFFUSION
de Pater I, Brecht SH: SL9 impacts and simulations of enhanced
radial
diffusion
ICARUS 151 (1): 39-50 MAY 2001
We present detailed calculations on enhanced radial diffusion
models and
show that many, though not all, of the phenomena observed during
the week
that Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 crashed into Jupiter can be explained
by a
sudden increase in the radial diffusion coefficient. Our
calculations use
estimates for the enhancement in the diffusion coefficient which
come from
self-consistent calculations of the electromagnetic turbulence
generated by
the impacts (Brecht er al. 2001, Icarus). These calculations
suggest that
the diffusion coefficient is enhanced at least a few million
times above the
nominal value during a short period of time (minutes). Our model
shows that
Jupiter's main radiation peaks brighten up much more than the
high latitude
regions, as is indeed observed following impacts during the first
few days
of the impact week. The calculations also suggest that the
largest
enhancements in intensity and largest inward shift of the
radiation peaks
occur at jovicentric longitudes similar to 100 degrees less than
or similar
to lambda (III) less than or similar to 250 degrees, i.e., the
longitude
range where the B = constant contours are furthest from the
planet. This
longitude range agrees with the region where the strongest
enhancements have
indeed been observed. The dramatic increase in the intensity of
the high
latitude peaks following impacts which took place later in the
week is
attributed to a direct acceleration of electrons by the upward
propagating
shock. Finally, compared to the observations, the radial
diffusion models
predict much larger enhancements in the radiation peaks than
observed. We
attribute this, as well as the initial decrease in intensity on
July 16-17,
to a large loss of electrons caused by pitch angle scattering.
(C) 2001
Academic Press.
Addresses:
de Pater I, Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Astron, 601 Campbell Hall,
Berkeley,
CA 94720 USA
Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Astron, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
Bay Area Res Corp, Orinda, CA 94563 USA
Copyright © 2001 Institute for Scientific Information
==========
(14) FORCED PRECESSION MODELS FOR SIX ERRATIC COMETS
Krolikowska M, Sitarski G, Szutowicz S: Forced precession models
for six
erratic comets
ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS 368 (2): 676-688 MAR 2001
The nongravitational motion of six "erratic"
short-period comets is studied
on the basis of published astrometric observations. We present
the
precession models which successfully link all the observed
apparitions of
the comets: 16P/Brooks 2, 21P/Giacobini-Zinner,
31P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 2,
32P/Comas Sola, 37P/Forbes and 43P/Wolf-Harrington. We used the
Sekanina's
forced precession model of the rotating cometary nucleus to
include the
nongravitational terms into equations of the comet's motion.
Values of six
basic parameters (four connected with the rotating comet nucleus
and two
describing the precession of spin-axis of the nucleus) have been
determined
along the orbital elements from positional observations of the
comets. The
solutions were derived with additional assumptions which
introduce
instantaneous changes of modulus of reactive force, and of
maximum cometary
activity with respect to perihelion time. The present precession
models
impose some constraints on sizes and rotational periods of
cometary nuclei.
According to our solutions the nucleus of 21P/Giacobini-Zinner
with
oblateness along the spin-axis of about 0.29 (equatorial to polar
radius of
1.41) is the most oblate among six investigated comets.
Addresses:
Krolikowska M, Polish Acad Sci, Space Res Ctr, Bartycka 18A,
PL-00716
Warsaw, Poland
Polish Acad Sci, Space Res Ctr, PL-00716 Warsaw, Poland
Univ Bialystok, Inst Theoret Phys, PL-15424 Bialystok, Poland
Copyright © 2001 Institute for Scientific Information
=========
(15) THE ORBIT EVOLUTION OF 32 PLUTINOS OVER 100 MILLION YEARS
Wan XS, Huang TY: The orbit evolution of 32 plutinos over 100
million year
ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS 368 (2): 700-705 MAR 2001
The orbits of thirty two plutinos that are presently in the 3:2
mean motion
resonance with Neptune have been integrated numerically and
accurately to
10(8) years into the future. Fourteen of them are found in
unstable orbits
after encountering Neptune or Pluto. Six of eighteen plutinos
with stable
orbits are in the Kozai resonance or around its separatrix zone.
No node to
node, perihelion to perihelion secular resonance or the so called
1:1 super
resonance are found.
Addresses:
Huang TY, Nanjing Univ, Dept Astron, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R
China
Nanjing Univ, Dept Astron, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China
Natl Astron Observ, Beijing, Peoples R China
Copyright © 2001 Institute for Scientific Information
=============
(16) THE CHEMISTRY OF INTERSTELLAR SPACE
Herbst E: The chemistry of interstellar space
CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS 30 (3): 168-176 MAY 2001
Interstellar space is not empty, but contains gaseous and
particulate matter
that is concentrated into very large regions known as
interstellar clouds.
In the denser and cooler clouds, the gas is molecular and most of
the
molecules detected are organic in nature. The gas-phase molecules
are
synthesised from precursor atoms by rapid exothermic reactions in
the gas
and on the surfaces of tiny dust particles. Since dense
interstellar clouds
collapse to form stars and planetary systems, the molecules
produced in the
clouds may be eventually incorporated into solid bodies such as
comets,
meteors, and even planets.
Addresses:
Herbst E, Ohio State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Columbus, OH
43210 USA
Ohio State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
Copyright © 2001 Institute for Scientific Information
-------------------------------------------------------------------
THE CAMBRIDGE-CONFERENCE NETWORK (CCNet)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The CCNet is a scholarly electronic network. To
subscribe/unsubscribe,
please contact the moderator Benny J Peiser <b.j.peiser@livjm.ac.uk>.
Information circulated on this network is for scholarly and
educational use
only. The attached information may not be copied or reproduced
for
any other purposes without prior permission of the copyright
holders. The
fully indexed archive of the CCNet, from February 1997 on, can be
found at
http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/cccmenu.html
DISCLAIMER: The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed in the
articles
and texts and in other CCNet contributions do not
necessarily reflect the
opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of the moderator of this
network.