PLEASE NOTE:
* 
Date sent:        Wed, 15 Oct
1997 11:27:01 -0400 (EDT) 
From:            
Benny J Peiser <B.J.PEISER@livjm.ac.uk 
Subject:         
SCIENTIFIC CATASTROPHISM IN EARLY 19TH CENTURY BRITAIN 
To:              
cambridge-conference@livjm.ac.uk 
Priority:         NORMAL 
from: David Morrison <dmorrison@mail.arc.nasa.gov
--------------------------------------------
Bob Kobres has posted a prize-winning 1828 essay by David
Milne on the 
collisions of comets with the Earth.  A few interesting
excerpts are given 
below.  For full text see http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/peocomet.html.
DAVID MILNE: ESSAY ON COMETS (1828)
PART III. INFLUENCE OF COMETS AND PLANETS UPON ONE ANOTHER.
. . . . Upon the whole, then, we may be assured, that, by
proximity alone, 
Comets are almost wholly incapable of affecting either the
movements of the 
Planets, or the system of things upon their surface. But the case
is very 
different, on the supposition of actual contact: for one of those
circumstances, which would be the chief means of counteracting a
comet's 
influence in approaching a planet, viz. the rapidity of its
motion, would 
serve, by the momentum, to give great effect to a collision. . .
. 
But though the probability of such a collision is extremely
small, we see 
that it is perfectly possible in itself; whilst the amount of
that 
probability may be greatly increased by lapse of time. Let us
now, 
therefore, shortly attend to the consequences which might ensue
from such an 
event It is evident that much will depend on the direction of the
Comet's 
course at the time of its encountering a Planet. If both be
moving towards 
the same quarter of the heavens, each will glide off from the
surface of the 
other, and no very material changes will be produced, either on
their 
movements or on their physical constitution. But should the
directions of 
their respective courses be exactly opposite, when the
concurrence takes 
place, (a case, however, which it is easy to see can happen only
with 
retrograde comets), the consequences would necessarily be far
more serious 
and permanent. . . . 
Seeing, then, that the collision of a Comet and Planet is an
event lying 
within the verge of possibility, Have we any reason to suppose
that it is 
one which has ever happened? This question we can answer, only by
examining 
the movements and constitution of the Planets as they at present
exist, and 
tracing back the circumstances now characterizing both to those
causes by 
which they seem to have been produced. . . . . 
It appears highly probable that none of the planetary bodies
have sustained 
any alterations in their orbits by the collision of a comet. But
on this 
account we are not to suppose that a contact has never taken
place; because, 
though it may not have been sufficiently violent to have altered
the 
planet's orbit, it may nevertheless have materially affected its
physical 
organization, by impinging on its surface; nor, least of all, are
we to 
conclude, from the experience of the past, that the collision of
a comet 
with any of the planetary bodies, will never happen in the course
of time. 
Even though it were demonstrated that such a catastrophe has
never yet been 
fulfilled, this circumstance could afford no assurance that it
may not occur 
at some future period; and therefore, it behoves us shortly to
consider what 
would be the nature and amount of the physical changes which the
collision 
of a comet would produce on the surface of a planet. 
It is very true, as was formerly remarked, that the masses of
comets are 
usually small; and for this reason we might be disposed to
imagine, that the 
result of a collision would be trivial. But if a comet, moving
with the 
prodigious velocity which it acquires near its perihelion, should
chance to 
strike a planet, as for instance the Earth, then coming in an
opposite 
direction, the consequences would be truly disastrous . . . .
waters of the 
ocean, now attracted by the close approach and next driven from
their 
ancient bed by the contact of the comet, would sweep over the
face of the 
globe, covering even the highest mountains in their impetuous
course, and 
involving all things in undistinguishable ruin. Whole species of
plants and 
animals, existing in different quarters of the Earth, would, by
this 
cataclysm, be at once overwhelmed and annihilated: whilst the few
among the 
human race, who should happily be saved amid this shipwreck of
Nature, would 
soon relapse into a state of pristine ignorance and barbarism.
After such an 
event, by which all the monuments of art, and all the records of
learning, 
would be destroyed, mankind would necessarily for many centuries
be occupied 
with providing for their bare subsistence; and a long succession
of ages 
would elapse, before those stores of knowledge could be
retrieved, which 
their ancestors had been able to attain. When, however,
posterity, in the 
progress of time, had again become so far enlightened, as to
observe and 
speculate on the striking physical appearances, which in all
parts of the 
world would meet their attention, they could not fail to consider
them as 
the records of some great and sudden catastrophe, which at one
period must 
have befallen their globe. . . . . 
There seems, then, to be no fact better authenticated in the
physical 
history of our globe, than that there have taken place the most
violent and 
extensive inundations from the ocean: The only question of doubt
or 
difficulty, is to fix upon the causes which could thus have
impelled the 
ocean from its natural bed; and I have been somewhat particular
in detailing 
the various phenomena, in order that we may possess some data for
estimating 
the character of the agent to which these striking physical
convulsions must 
be attributed. Now, it is quite evident, that there exists no
agent on the 
earth itself, at all capable of creating such vast effects as
those which 
have been here described; seeing that there are no physical
causes of change 
on the surface of our planet, but what are so local and so
gradual in their 
operation, as to be totally inconsistent with the sudden and
extensive 
convulsions which we seek to explain. Since, then, this deluge
cannot be 
referred to any agent residing in the Earth itself, the only
foreign cause 
to which it can be ascribed, is either the near approach, or the
actual 
contact, of a Comet. But it is not difficult to see which of
those two 
hypotheses is, in this case, the one to be adopted. For when we
consider the 
astonishing violence by which this deluge was characterised; huge
fragments 
of rocks rent asunder and transported over ridges and valleys;
whole species 
of animals overwhelmed, and even the highest mountains
overtopped; the 
surface of the globe broken into isolated or disjointed groups,
and even a 
large portion of the materials of the southern hemisphere driven
beyond the 
equator,--it is impossible to conceive that these tremendous
effects could 
have been occasioned by any other agency, not wholly miraculous,
than the 
collision of a Comet. . . . . 
The same propensity which leads men to search into the history
of the past, 
awakens into the mind a still stronger desire of knowing the
secrets of 
futurity: And, accordingly, astronomers, not content with the
endeavour to 
learn the physical revolutions which the earth has already
sustained by the 
contact of a Comet, have sought to discover the period when it
may be again 
exposed to a similar catastrophe. This they have attempted to
accomplish, by 
computing for a multitude of successive revolutions the motions
of those 
Comets, whose orbits are exactly computed, and ascertaining the
time of 
their greatest proximity to the earth. But, before we detail the
result of 
these curious investigations, it may be proper to give some
account of the 
Comets, whose calculated orbits and periods of revolution have
been verified 
by observation. . . . . 
[there follow order-of-magnitude calculations of the
probability of a 
cometary impact with Earth] 
But such speculations, however striking the results, conduce
to no 
practical advantage, and contribute little to the advancement of
science. 
They afford astonishing proofs of the energy of man's
intellectual power, by 
which he extends his vision to the horizon of the most distant
futurity, and 
looks forward, it may be, with a feeling of complacent assurance,
to those 
momentous events, which, from his knowledge of nature, he is
enabled to 
foresee. But let him not rest too confidently on the verity of
such 
anticipations. Astronomers have prophesied, it is true, the
collision of a 
Comet with the earth; an event that will at once destroy the
greater part of 
the human species: but any slight attraction, which, in
calculating the 
movements of this comet, they have chanced to overlook, must
invalidate all 
their conclusions, and render the prediction at once vain and
futile; while, 
perhaps, some other comet, among the many thousands traversing
the system, 
and following an orbit to us unknown, may, in the mean while,
come in 
contact with our globe, and thus, without any warning of its
approach, 
produce the same terrible effects, long before the expected
period have 
arrived.
[For full text see: http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/peocomet.html ]